IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v15y2020i3p55-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Accounting of the Future Online?

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeta Andreea Budacia

    (Romanian American University)

  • Lucian C-tin Gabriel Budacia

    (Romanian American University)

Abstract

The quality of accounting services is a set of dynamic characteristics, as the demands of modern technology impose the permanent creation and realization of new modern “products” with superior traits and performance on the delivery process. The evaluation of the quality of accounting services implies the appraisal of the final result, as well as of the actual delivery of the service; practically, the quality of the service cannot be separated from the activity of providing it. Today, the difference between an average service and a high quality one is given by the efficiency with which the people from the provider’s team work together and the systems through which they deliver the service. The relationship between entrepreneurs and accountants is inevitable, as accounting is a mandatory activity by law, but also a useful one. Providing high quality accounting services depends on the manner in which the provider and the beneficiary interact

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeta Andreea Budacia & Lucian C-tin Gabriel Budacia, 2020. "Is the Accounting of the Future Online?," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 15(3), pages 55-60, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:55-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/FA20/REBE-FA20-A4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego Comin & Martí Mestieri, 2018. "If Technology Has Arrived Everywhere, Why Has Income Diverged?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 137-178, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphael Bergoeing & Norman V. Loayza & Facundo Piguillem, 2016. "The Whole is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: Complementary Reforms to Address Microeconomic Distortions," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 268-305.
    2. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    3. Åsa Johansson, 2016. "Public Finance, Economic Growth and Inequality: A Survey of the Evidence," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1346, OECD Publishing.
    4. Kose,Ayhan & Ohnsorge,Franziska Lieselotte & Ye,Lei Sandy & Islamaj,Ergys, 2017. "Weakness in investment growth : causes, implications and policy responses," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7990, The World Bank.
    5. Comin, Diego & Rode, Johannes, 2013. "From Green Users to Green Voters," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63678, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Björn Brey, 2021. "The Long-run Gains from the Early Adoption of Electricity," Working Papers ECARES 2021-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Thomas Sampson, 2023. "Technology Gaps, Trade, and Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(2), pages 472-513, February.
    8. Yang, Xiaoliang & Barros, Lucy & Matthews, Kent & Meenagh, David, 2024. "The dynamics of redistribution, inequality and growth across China’s regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 613-637.
    9. Tyce, Matthew, 2020. "Beyond the neoliberal-statist divide on the drivers of innovation: A political settlements reading of Kenya’s M-Pesa success story," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Andrea Szalavetz, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Development Strategy in Dependent Market Economies - Any Room amidst Big Power Rivalry?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 40-54.
    11. José De Gregorio, 2018. "Productivity in Emerging Market Economies: Slowdown or Stagnation?," Working Papers wp471, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    12. Mike W Peng & David Ahlstrom & Shawn M Carraher & Weilei (Stone) Shi, 2017. "An institution-based view of global IPR history," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(7), pages 893-907, September.
    13. Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús & Delventhal, Matthew J. & Guner, Nezih, 2021. "Demographic Transitions Across Time and Space," CEPR Discussion Papers 16708, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Maloney, William F. & Valencia Caicedo, Felipe, 2014. "Engineers, Innovative Capacity and Development in the Americas," IZA Discussion Papers 8271, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. World Bank, "undated". "World Bank East Asia and Pacific Economic Update, April 2016," World Bank Publications - Reports 24015, The World Bank Group.
    16. Bianchi, Francesco & Comin, Diego & Kung, Howard & Kind, Thilo & Matusche, Alexander, 2019. "Slow recoveries through fiscal austerity: New insights in the effects of fiscal austerity," ZEW policy briefs 2/2019, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Naude, Wim & Nagler, Paula, 2015. "Industrialisation, Innovation, Inclusion," MERIT Working Papers 2015-043, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Sun, Sunny Li & Choi, Yoona & Guo, Feng & Guo, Jinyu & Zou, Bo & Cui, Lin, 2023. "Winning intellectual property rights lawsuits in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
    19. Paul Conway & Lisa Meehan & Guanyu Zheng, 2015. "Do New Zealand firms catch up to the domestic productivity frontier?," Working Papers 2015/03, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    20. Jung Kwan Kim & Ram Mudambi, 2020. "An ecosystem-based analysis of design innovation infringements: South Korea and China in the global tire industry," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 38-57, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:55-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.