IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v10y2016i2p393-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transectional Analysis Between Innovation And Ict Readiness For The European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ana-Maria Preda

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Daniela Alexandra Crișan

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Justina Lavinia Stănică

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adam Nelu Altăr Samuel

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Previous researches have shown that the Innovation performance is in a strong link with the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) readiness, at European Union level. In this article, we have investigated if these results still maintain in 2015, according to data published in 2016 reports, and whether they are dependent on the indicator used for measuring innovation. Using unifactorial linear regressions, a comparative analysis has been developed: we modeled the relationship between the Networked Readiness Index (NRI) – created by the World Economic Forum, in collaboration with INSEAD, and published yearly since 2002- and: (1) the Global Innovation Index (GII) – published yearly since 2007, by INSEAD in collaboration with WIPO, Cornell University and their Knowledge Partners, on one hand, and (2) the Summary Innovation Index (SII) – created on the initiative of the European Commission and computed yearly since 2001- on the other hand. The transversal linkage between the two pairs of indicators for the 28 Member States were tested. The results show a strong relationship between ICT and innovation in 2015. This relationship is not accidental - it has been verified using historical data for the last 8 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana-Maria Preda & Daniela Alexandra Crișan & Justina Lavinia Stănică & Adam Nelu Altăr Samuel, 2016. "Transectional Analysis Between Innovation And Ict Readiness For The European Union Countries," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(2), pages 393-403, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:393-403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/WI16/JISOM-WI16-A12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sacha Wunsch-Vincent & Bruno Lanvin & Soumitra Dutta, 2015. "The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development," Working Papers id:7491, eSocialSciences.
    2. Ana-Maria Preda & Daniela Alexandra Crisan & Justina Lavinia Stanica, 2014. "The Impact Of Ict On Innovation Performance In Europe. Case Of Romania," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(1), pages 197-206, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo & Giovanni Schiuma & Giuseppina Passiante, 2018. "Insights for Shaping Entrepreneurship Education: Evidence from the European Entrepreneurship Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Ekaterina S. Titova, 2019. "Biofuel Application as a Factor of Sustainable Development Ensuring: The Case of Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    3. Khedhaouria, Anis & Thurik, Roy, 2017. "Configurational conditions of national innovation capability: A fuzzy set analysis approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 48-58.
    4. Zhongqi Xie & Ying Zhang & Zhiqiang Fang, 2022. "High-Quality Development Evaluation and Spatial Evolution Analysis of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. John W Lang & N. Aldori, 2020. "An Extension to Late Rentierism, using a Comparative Compound Diversification Index, to Show the Movement Towards Mixed Mode Economic Diversification and Development, in the GCC States," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 4057-4057, December.
    6. İhsan Pençe & Adnan Kalkan & Melike Şişeci Çeşmeli, 2019. "Estimation of the Country Ranking Scores on the Global Innovation Index 2016 Using the Artificial Neural Network Method," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Vergara, Sebastián, 2021. "The role of productive and technological capabilities in export dynamics in developing countries," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    8. Vitaliy Omelyanenko, 2017. "Economic Diplomacy in the Innovation Global Value Chains as the National Security Providing Strategy Component," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 3(3(20)), pages 3.1-3.8, March.
    9. Xionghe Qin & Debin Du & Mei-Po Kwan, 2019. "Spatial spillovers and value chain spillovers: evaluating regional R&D efficiency and its spillover effects in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 721-747, May.
    10. Roberta Arbolino & Raffaele Boffardi & Luisa De Simone, 2019. "Which are the Factors Influencing Innovation Performances? Evidence from Italian Cohesion Policy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 221-247, November.
    11. Matthews, Lane & Heyden, Mariano L.M. & Zhou, Dan, 2022. "Paradoxical transparency? Capital market responses to exploration and exploitation disclosure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    12. Loke Wei Kit & Noor Hidayah Binti Abu, 2017. "Analyzing the Impact of Knowledge Management on Technological Innovation: An Empirical Study of Electrical and Electronics Industry in Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(7), pages 640-648, July.
    13. Matejun Marek, 2016. "Role of technology entrepreneurship in the development of innovativeness of small and medium-sized enterprises," Management, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 167-183, May.
    14. A. S. Ermakov & I. A. Liman, 2019. "Evaluation of Science and Technology Performance of the Regions of the Russian Federation," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 198-204, March.
    15. Xionghe Qin & Debin Du, 2017. "Do External or Internal Technology Spillovers Have a Stronger Influence on Innovation Efficiency in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Proksch, Dorian & Haberstroh, Marcus Max & Pinkwart, Andreas, 2017. "Increasing the national innovative capacity: Identifying the pathways to success using a comparative method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 256-270.
    17. Nuno Campos Pereira & Nuno Araújo & Leonardo Costa, 2016. "A counting multidimensional innovation index for SMEs," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 01, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    18. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2016. "Technological Potential of European Economy. Proposition of Measurement with Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(3), pages 7-17.
    19. Cornelius A. Rietveld & Pankaj C. Patel, 2022. "A critical assessment of the National Entrepreneurship Context Index of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor," Papers 2204.05749, arXiv.org.
    20. Mthanti, Thanti & Ojah, Kalu, 2017. "Entrepreneurial orientation (EO): Measurement and policy implications of entrepreneurship at the macroeconomic level," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 724-739.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:393-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.