IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/qua/journl/v1y2005i2p125-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Los criterios de objetividad cientifica y las metodologias cuantitativas y cualitativas en el analisis de la ventaja competitiva, ¿aun existe un debate?

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Fong Reynoso

    (Universidad de Guadalajara)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Fong Reynoso, 2005. "Los criterios de objetividad cientifica y las metodologias cuantitativas y cualitativas en el analisis de la ventaja competitiva, ¿aun existe un debate?," EconoQuantum, Revista de Economia y Finanzas, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Economico Administrativas, Departamento de Metodos Cuantitativos y Maestria en Economia., vol. 1(2), pages 125-139, Enero-Jun.
    • Handle: RePEc:qua:journl:v:1:y:2005:i:2:p:125-139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econoquantum.cucea.udg.mx/index.php/EQ/article/view/177
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://econoquantum.cucea.udg.mx/index.php/EQ/issue/view/26
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jose Asuncion Corona Duenas & Cesar Corona Pacheco & Maria Antonia Nunez & Isabel Jaraba, 2019. "Development Of Risk Administration In Large Private Companies Of Guadalajara Jalisco: Difficulties And Benefits El Desarrollo De La Administracion De Riesgos En Las Grandes Empresas Privadas De Guadal," Revista Global de Negocios, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 51-70.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qua:journl:v:1:y:2005:i:2:p:125-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sandra Ivett Portugal Padilla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dmudgmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.