IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pts/journl/y2018i3p169-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study Of Financial Profitability Of Romanian Tourism Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Daniela BONDOC

    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Mihaela Iuliana DUMITRU

    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

The objective of our paper is to examine the performance of companies in the Romanian tourism sector based on profitability indicators and to highlight the possible correlations between them. Financial performance was studied based on the average values of Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Sales (ROS) calculated over a 10-year period. Our analysis is focused on tourism companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange, which obtained net profits throughout the period. The database was built on the annual financial reports for the period 2008-2017, available on the Bucharest Stock Exchange website and on the website of the Ministry of Public Finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Daniela BONDOC & Mihaela Iuliana DUMITRU, 2018. "Comparative Study Of Financial Profitability Of Romanian Tourism Companies," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 17(3), pages 169-176.
    • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2018:i:3:p:169-176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economic.upit.ro/repec/pdf/2018_3_22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Profitability ratios; Tourism; Financial performance; Quantitative methods; Pearson correlation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2018:i:3:p:169-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Hagiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fepitro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.