IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rfreco/rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_20_1_1565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Une analyse économique de la réforme de la PAC de juin 2003

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pierre Butault
  • Alexandre Gohin
  • Hervé Guyomard
  • Ahmed Barkaoui

Abstract

[eng] An Economic Assessment of the June 2003 Common Agricultural Policy Reform. The main innovation of the June 2003 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform is to replace most market aids by a single direct payment per farm disconnected from production choices and levels (decoupling process), conditional on the respect of statutory environmental, food safety, animal health and animal welfare standards as well as good agronomic and environmental practices (cross-compliance process). This decoupled payment will be progressively reduced up to a maximum of 5 % and funds saved through this modulation mechanism will be switched from the first pillar of the CAP to a consolidated and strengthened rural development regulation confirmed as the second pillar of the CAP. In application of the subsidiary principle, important degrees of freedom are given to Member States in terms of market aids which would remained coupled and in defining cross-compliance national criteria. The objectives of this paper are the following. In a first stage, it presents the reform and proposes a qualitative analysis of measures adopted in June 2003. In a second stage, it provides a quantitative assessment of the reform for the European agricultural sector: impacts on supply, demand, exports and imports, prices, agricultural incomes, budget costs and welfare. In a third stage, the same exercise performed at the French scale allows us to give first responses to some interrogations raised by the decoupling of the income support policy. Attention is focused on three issues, i.e., land abandonment, extensification and the process of specialisation of farms and regions. We conclude by presenting our point of view on necessary evolutions of the CAP. [fre] ce est utilisé pour apporter une première réponse à certaines interrogations que pose le découplage. L'attention est centrée sur les questions d'abandon de terres, d'extensification et de spécialisation productive des exploitations et des régions. En conclusion, nous présentons quelques pistes souhaitables d'évolution de la PAC.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre Butault & Alexandre Gohin & Hervé Guyomard & Ahmed Barkaoui, 2005. "Une analyse économique de la réforme de la PAC de juin 2003," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 20(1), pages 57-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_20_1_1565
    DOI: 10.3406/rfeco.2005.1565
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2005.1565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.2005.1565
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_20_1_1565
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/rfeco.2005.1565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_20_1_1565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/rfeco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.