Author
Abstract
[fre] Malthus apporte à l'école classique l'essentiel de son argumentation, mais s'en démarque par son rejet de la loi des débouchés. Mais cette pensée est-elle aussi unitaire qu'il le paraît ? A la thèse de la continuité d'une pensée défendue par Faure-Soulet s'oppose celle de !a rupture soutenue par Paglin. La thèse ici défendue est celle de ruptures analytiques évidentes entre l'Essai et les Principes et qui n'interdisent pas cependant une remarquable continuité doctrinale, à rechercher, non pas comme le fait Keynes dans la vision d'un Malthus humaniste, mais en tentant de répondre à la question posée par Oser : quel groupe de personnes l'œuvre sert-elle ou cherche-t-elle à servir ? [eng] One or two malthus? . guy caire. Although Malthus provides the classical school with its major argumentation, he differentiates himself from it by refuting the Say's law. But is his thought as unitary as it appears to be at first sight ? Faure-Soulet defends the thesis of the continuity of the thought of Malthus, whereas Paglin on he contrary sees many ruptures in it. The thesis wich is sustained here is the one of the existence of a clear discontinuance between the Essay and the Principles, thought it does not prevent a remarkable doctrinal continuity ; the lutter is not to be found however in the vision of a humanist Malthus, as was the case for Keynes, but rather when trying to answer the following question put forward by Oser : to which group of persans does his work benefit or seek to benefit ?
Suggested Citation
Guy Caire, 1984.
"Un ou deux Malthus ?,"
Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 35(4), pages 623-634.
Handle:
RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1984_num_35_4_408797
DOI: 10.3406/reco.1984.408797
Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.1984.408797
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1984_num_35_4_408797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.