IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recoru/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les odeurs d'élevages: textes, conflits et négociations locales

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Nicourt
  • Jean-Max Girault
  • Jean Bourliaud

Abstract

[fre] Désormais, la production agricole dans un espace conçu comme ambivalent -entre privé et public- rend les odeurs inacceptables. Ce rejet est d'autant plus fort que les populations semblent découvrir une agriculture «industrialisée» et ses nuisances. Alors, l'absence des textes, comme ressources de régulation, accroît les rancœurs et développe les conflits. Avec une approche restreinte aux odeurs des effluents d'élevages et en faisant référence à des terrains situés en Dordo- gne, nous développons l'hypothèse que les carences de prise en compte légale de la question des odeurs en suscitent une gestion informelle, qui trouve aujourd'hui ses limites dans le cadre d'un espace rural en recomposition. [eng] HUSBANDRIES SMELLS . TEXTS, CONFLICTS AND LOCAL NEGOTIATIONS . From now, the space within agriculture is producing, is considered as ambivalent, between private and public. Thus, bad smells are unacceptabled. This reject is so hard as near as populations seem to discover industrial agriculture and its effects. Then, the lack of texts, as regulation means, increase resentments and conflicts. With an approch limited to husbandries waste smells and referins to fieldwork located in Dordogne, we développe the hypothesis that legal inefficiency taking care of smell problem lead to a non formal management, with find today its limits in a recombined rural space.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Nicourt & Jean-Max Girault & Jean Bourliaud, 2000. "Les odeurs d'élevages: textes, conflits et négociations locales," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 260(1), pages 79-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1112
    DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.2000.1112
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2000.1112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.1112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecoru.2000.1112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Nicourt, 2011. "Normalisation du travail d’élevage et vulnérabilité sociale des éleveurs de porcs," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 92(1), pages 69-95.
    2. DANIEL, François-Joseph, 2015. "De l'usage collectif des sens. Fonctionnement et incertitudes d'un jury de nez riverain," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(4), November.
    3. Nicourt, Christian, 2011. "Normalisation du travail d’élevage et vulnérabilité sociale des éleveurs de porcs," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 92(1).
    4. François-Joseph DANIEL, 2015. "De l’usage collectif des sens. Fonctionnement et incertitudes d’un jury de nez riverain," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(4), pages 599-624.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecoru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.