IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2009_hos_9_1_5439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La crise mondiale de la titrisation et la dynamique des fonds souverains

Author

Listed:
  • Justin O’Brien

Abstract

[eng] Global Securitization Crisis and Sovereign Wealth Funds . The Generally Accepted Principles and Practices for sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) -the Santiago Principles -are designed to address contestation over the role played by government-controlled asset pools in global capital markets and reduce negative public perceptions about the impact on social cohesion in recipient countries by outlining minimum standards of accountability and transparency. The paper examines how the changing nature of the global financial crisis impacted on the dynamics of the regulatory debate. It maps the dimensions of the crisis and assesses the risks associated with the expansion of state-controlled capital. It argues that the continued failure to clarify the rules governing inward investment makes it much more difficult to build the foundations of a new financial order. . JEL Classification : F30, GO1, G18 [fre] Les principes et pratiques généralement acceptés pour les fonds souverains -les Principes de Santiago -ont pour objet de répondre aux contestations sur le rôle que jouent des pools d'actifs contrôlés par des gouvernements et de réduire les perceptions négatives de leur rôle dans l'opinion publique des pays d'accueil, en définissant des critères minimums de responsabilisation et de transparence. Cet article étudie la manière dont la nature changement de la crise financière mondiale a affecté la dynamique du débat sur la réglementation. Il mesure les dimensions de la crise et évalue les risques associés à l'expansion de capital public. Il souligne que l'incapacité persistante à définir les règles régissant les investissements extérieurs complique sérieusement l'édification d'un nouvel ordre fi nancier. . Classification JEL : F30, GOI, G18

Suggested Citation

  • Justin O’Brien, 2009. "La crise mondiale de la titrisation et la dynamique des fonds souverains," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 9(1), pages 291-303.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2009_hos_9_1_5439
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2009.5439
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2009.5439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2009.5439
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2009_hos_9_1_5439
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2009.5439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben S. Bernanke, 2008. "Risk management in financial institutions," Proceedings 1070, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    2. Edward M. Graham & David Marchick, 2006. "US National Security and Foreign Direct Investment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 3917, April.
    3. John Lipsky, 2008. "Dealing with the Financial Turmoil: Contingent Risks, Policy Challenges and the Role of the IMF," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 185-192, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin O’Brien, 2009. "Global Securitization Crisis and Sovereign Wealth Funds," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 9(1), pages 271-282.
    2. Dong-Hun Kim, 2013. "Coercive Assets? Foreign Direct Investment and the Use of Economic Sanctions," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 99-117, January.
    3. Anna Vlasiuk Nibe, 2023. "Legitimisation of Foreign Direct Investment Screening Among Business Actors: The Danish Case," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 140-153.
    4. Olivier Bertrand & Katariina Nilsson Hakkala & Pehr‐Johan Norbäck & Lars Persson, 2012. "Should countries block foreign takeovers of R&D champions and promote greenfield entry?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1083-1124, August.
    5. Ellen R. McGrattan & Edward C. Prescott, 2010. "Technology Capital and the US Current Account," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1493-1522, September.
    6. Sergio Mariotti, 2023. "Competition policy in the new wave of global protectionism. Prospects for preserving a fdi-friendly institutional environment," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(2), pages 227-241, June.
    7. Ashley Thomas Lenihan, 2014. "Sovereign Wealth Funds and the Acquisition of Power," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 227-257, March.
    8. Duran, Miguel A. & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2013. "Off-balance-sheet activity under adverse selection: The European experience," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 176-190.
    9. Jing Li & Daniel Shapiro & Anastasia Ufimtseva, 2024. "Regulating inbound foreign direct investment in a world of hegemonic rivalry: the evolution and diffusion of US policy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 147-165, June.
    10. A. Edward Safarian, 2011. "International Mergers and Acquisitions," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Lim, Chu Yeong & Woods, Margaret & Humphrey, Christopher & Seow, Jean Lin, 2017. "The paradoxes of risk management in the banking sector," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 75-90.
    12. Zhang, Jianhong & He, Xinming, 2014. "Economic nationalism and foreign acquisition completion: The case of China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 212-227.
    13. A. E. Safarian, 2015. "Simplifying the Rule Book: a Proposal to Reform and Clarify Canada’s Policy on Inward Foreign Direct Investment," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 425, May.
    14. Olivier Bertrand & Marie-Ann Betschinger & Alexander Settles, 2016. "The relevance of political affinity for the initial acquisition premium in cross-border acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(10), pages 2071-2091, October.
    15. Assaf, Dan, 2008. "Models of critical information infrastructure protection," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 1(C), pages 6-14.
    16. David Godsell & Ugur Lel & Darius Miller, 2023. "U.S. national security and de-globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1471-1494, October.
    17. Kirkegaard, Jacob Funk, 2012. "Transactions: A New Look at Service Sector Foreign Direct Investment in Asia," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 318, Asian Development Bank.
    18. Sergio Mariotti, 2022. "A warning from the Russian–Ukrainian war: avoiding a future that rhymes with the past," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 761-782, December.
    19. Li, Megan Yuan & Makino, Shige & Jiang, Chunyan, 2019. "Does national sentiment affect foreign direct investment, and if so, how? Additional evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    20. Matthew J. Baltz, 2017. "Institutionalizing neoliberalism: CFIUS and the governance of inward foreign direct investment in the United States since 1975," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 859-880, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2009_hos_9_1_5439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.