IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_79_2_3976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les enjeux de la multigestion

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Roy

Abstract

[eng] The multi-management’s challenges. The increase in importance of multi-management appears to be unavoidable. It is part of a more global process of a development of open architecture models, which goes against the European vertical integration Model. Multi-management is one of the solutions the sector has chosen ; to be able to cope with the deep industrial changes it has had to overcome since early 2000. This evolution enables the Asset managers, who face the necessity of having to focus on their core business, to have access to a wider range of distribution opportunities. It offers final investors and BtoC distributors an outstanding possibility to outsource asset management through its capacity to select funds according to the quality of the investment management, and assemble them in order to create the most efficient asset allocation model and to control the combination therefore created. In this regard, multi-management is the kind of open architecture the more in adequation with the expectations of the majority. . JEL classification : G11, G23 [fre] La montée en puissance de la multigestion semble inéluctable. Elle s’inscrit dans un processus plus global de développement des architectures ouvertes, aux dépens du schéma européen traditionnel de l’intégration verticale. Et constitue l’une des réponses du secteur de la gestion d’actifs à la profonde mutation industrielle qu’il subit depuis le début des années 2000. Aux « producteurs » poussés à se spécialiser sur leur coeur de métier, elle a vocation à offrir des nouveaux débouchés. Aux investisseurs finaux, et à leurs intermédiaires distributeurs, sa capacité à sélectionner les fonds en fonction de la qualité de leur gestion, à les assembler dans un schéma optimisé d’allocation d’actifs, et à contrôler la combinaison ainsi obtenue, fournit un outil idéal d’externalisation d’actifs. En ce sens, la multigestion est la forme d’architecture ouverte la plus adaptée aux attentes du plus grand nombre. . Classification JEL : G11, G23

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Roy, 2005. "Les enjeux de la multigestion," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 79(2), pages 153-164.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_79_2_3976
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2005.3976
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2005.3976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2005.3976
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_79_2_3976
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2005.3976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Aaron & Isabelle Bilon & Sébastien Galanti & Yamina Tadjeddine, 2005. "Les styles de gestion de portefeuille existent-ils ?," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 81(4), pages 171-188.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_79_2_3976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.