IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La pauvreté en Slovaquie et en France : quelques éléments de comparaison

Author

Listed:
  • Madior Fall
  • Marian Horecký
  • Eva Rohácová

Abstract

[fre] La pauvreté en Slovaquie et en France : quelques éléments de comparaison . Tout en tenant compte des spécificités socioéconomi- ques, la comparaison de la France et de la Slovaquie, au regard de différentes mesures de la pauvreté relative à chaque pays, met en évidence de grandes ressemblances à côté de quelques différences. En Slovaquie, la population, plus jeune et plus rurale, perçoit des revenus, en moyenne, moins élevés. Cependant les ressources sont plus uniformément réparties qu'en France. Si les conforts de base sont assurés dans les deux pays, les familles slovaques sont moins équipées, se sentent moins à l'aise que les ménages français et sont plus inquiets quant à leur avenir. La Slovaquie vient de passer d'une économie socialiste administrée par l'État à une économie de marché et les . perturbations liées à cette transition peuvent expliquer, en partie, cette insatisfaction. . En France comme en Slovaquie, le risque de pauvreté est plus grand pour les familles monoparentales. Dans les deux pays, les personnes les plus démunies ont plus souvent un faible niveau de formation ou une mauvaise santé. Être locataire ou ne pouvoir compter sur un proche (ami ou famille) en cas de difficultés sont aussi des situations plus fréquentes parmi les pauvres. Les ménages considérés pauvres, simultanément selon les trois approches de cette notion (à partir de questions d'opinion, des conditions de vie ou d'une évaluation monétaire), sont aussi peu nombreux dans les deux pays. [spa] La pobreza en Eslovaquia y en Francia : unos cuantos elementos de comparaciôn . Aun tomando en cuenta especifidades socioeconômicas, la comparaciôn de Francia y de Eslovaquia, en cuanto a diferentes mediciones de la pobreza relativa en cada pais, hace patentes numerosos similes junto con unas cuantas diferencias. En Eslovaquia, la poblaciôn, mâs joven y mâs rural, percibe rentas en un promedio menos altas. Con todo, los recursos quedan repartidos de manera mâs uniforma que en Francia. Si bien las comodidades bâsicas son garantizadas en ambos pafses, las familias eslovacas estân menos equipadas, se sienten mâs ahogados que los hogares franceses y estân mâs preocupados por el porvenir. Eslovaquia acaba de pasar de una economia socialista administrada por el estado a una economfa de mercado y las perturbaciones debidas a esta transiciôn pueden explicar por parte esta insatisfacciôn. En Francia como en Eslovaquia, el riesgo de pobreza es mayor para las familias monoparentales. En ambos pafses, las personas mâs desfavorecidas disfrutan a menudo de un bajo nivel de formaciôn o de mala salud. Ser inquilino o no poder contar con un deudo (familia o amigo) en caso de dificultades son también situaciones mâs frecuentes entre los pobres. Los hogares considerados como pobres, segûn las très maneras de enfocar esta nociôn (a partir de encuestas de opinion, de las condiciones de vida o de una evaluaciôn monetaria), son tan poco numerosos en ambos pafses. [ger] Armut in der Slowakei und in Frankreich: einige Vergleichselemente . Trotz Berucksichtigung der sozioôkonomischen Besonderheiten gehen aus einem Vergleich der verschiedenen Verfahren zur Messung der Armut in Frankreich und in der Slowakei neben einigen Unterschieden groBe Àhnlichkeiten hervor. In der Slowakei bezieht die Bevôlkerung, die jûnger und làndlicher ist, im Schnitt geringere Einkunfte. Dagegen sind die Ressourcen gleichmâBiger verteilt als in Frankreich. Der grundlegende Komfort ist zwar in beiden Lândern sichergestellt; die slowakischen Familien sind jedoch weniger gut ausgestattet, sind weniger zufrieden als die franzôsischen Haushalte und machen sich grôBere Sorgen um ihre Zukunft. Die Slowakei ist vor kurzem von einer staatlich gelenkten sozialistischen Volkswirtschaft zu einer Marktwirtschaft ûbergegangen, und die aus diesem . Ùbergang erwachsenden Stôrungen kônnen diese Unzufriedenheit zum Teil erklàren. In Frankreich wie auch in der Slowakei ist das Risiko der Armut fur Alleinerziehende grôBer. In beiden Làndern haben die àrmsten Personen oftmals nur ein geringes Ausbildungsniveau oder sind in schlechter Gesundheit. Mieter zu sein oder im Falle von Schwierigkeiten nicht auf eine nahestehende Person (Freund oder Famiiie) zàhlen zu kônnen, sind Situationen, die bei den Armen hàufiger auftreten. Die Zahl der Haushalte, die bei gleichzeitiger Erfiillung der drei Kriterien dieses Begriffes (Fragen der persônlichen Einschâtzung, der Lebensverhâltnisse oder der Bewertung der Finanzlage) als arm gelten, ist in beiden Lândern gleich gering. [eng] Poverty in Slovakia and France: A Comparison . This comparison of the different poverty measures relative to France and Slovakia makes allowance for specific socioeconomic features and finds significant similarities alongside a few differences. In Slovakia, the younger and more rural population secures lower incomes on average. However, resources are more evenly spread than in France. Although both countries have the basic conveniences, Slovakian families are less well-equipped, feel less comfortably off than the French households and are more concerned about their future. Slovakia recently made the transition from a centrally planned socialist economy to a free-market economy. The resulting disruption could partially explain this dissatisfaction. . In France and Slovakia alike, lone-parent families are at greater risk of poverty. In both countries, the most impoverished more often have a low level of education or poor health. Being a tenant and having no friends or family to turn to in times of adversity are also more frequent among the poor. Yet the two countries contain few households that are simultaneously defined as poor by all three approaches to this notion (opinion polls, living conditions and monetary evaluation).

Suggested Citation

  • Madior Fall & Marian Horecký & Eva Rohácová, 1998. "La pauvreté en Slovaquie et en France : quelques éléments de comparaison," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 308(1), pages 241-259.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2602
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1998.2602
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1998.2602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1998.2602
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2602
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1998.2602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shorrocks, Anthony F, 1984. "Inequality Decomposition by Population Subgroups," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(6), pages 1369-1385, November.
    2. Guénhaël Jegouzo, 1984. "Petite paysannerie en France," Post-Print hal-01959659, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alonso-Villar, Olga & del Río, Coral, 2010. "Local versus overall segregation measures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 30-38, July.
    2. Vesselin Mintchev & Venelin Boshnakov & Alexander Naydenov, 2010. "Sources of Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 39-64.
    3. Oihana Aristondo & Casilda Lasso De La Vega & Ana Urrutia, 2010. "A New Multiplicative Decomposition For The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke Poverty Indices," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 259-267, July.
    4. Tomoki Fujii, 2013. "Geographic decomposition of inequality in health and wealth: evidence from Cambodia," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 11(3), pages 373-392, September.
    5. Michael P. Keane & Eswar S. Prasad, 2002. "Inequality, Transfers, And Growth: New Evidence From The Economic Transition In Poland," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(2), pages 324-341, May.
    6. Andonie, Costel & Kuzmics, Christoph & Rogers, Brian W., 2019. "Efficiency-based measures of inequality," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 60-69.
    7. Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ana Urrutia & Oscar Volij, 2011. "An Axiomatic Characterization Of The Theil Inequality Order," Working Papers 1103, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    8. Zhang, Cheng & Weng, Xiyan, 2024. "Can broadband infrastructure construction promote equality of opportunity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China☆," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Tugce, Cuhadaroglu, 2013. "My Group Beats Your Group: Evaluating Non-Income Inequalities," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-49, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    10. Kanbur, Ravi & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2001. "Fifty Years Of Regional Inequality In China: A Journey Through Revolution, Reform And Openness," Working Papers 7236, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. P. Jenkins, Stephen & A. Cowell, Frank, 2000. "Estimating welfare indices: household weights and sample design," ISER Working Paper Series 2000-23, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    12. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    13. Jeremy Lise & Shannon Seitz, 2011. "Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 328-355.
    14. Sami Bibi & AbdelRahmen El Lahga, 2010. "Generating Reliable Data to Perform Distributional Analysis in the Arab Region," Working Papers 561, Economic Research Forum, revised 10 Jan 2010.
    15. Gabriele Ballarino & Michela Braga & Massimiliano Bratti & Daniele Checchi & Antonio Filippin & Carlo V. Fiorio & Marco Leonardi & Elena Meschi & Francesco Scervini, 2013. "GINI Country Report: Growing Inequalities and their Impacts in Italy," GINI Country Reports italy, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    16. Frank A Cowell & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2018. "Inequality Measurement and the Rich: Why inequality increased more than we thought," STICERD - Public Economics Programme Discussion Papers 36, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    17. Bosmans, Kristof & Cowell, Frank A., 2010. "The class of absolute decomposable inequality measures," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 154-156, December.
    18. Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa & Laurence Roope & Finn Tarp, 2017. "Global Inequality: Relatively Lower, Absolutely Higher," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(4), pages 661-684, December.
    19. Xiaobing Wang & Jenifer Piesse, 2009. "Welfare Effects of Regressive Taxation and Subsidies in China," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 10809, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    20. Stephen P. Jenkins & Philippe Van Kerm, 2006. "Trends in income inequality, pro-poor income growth, and income mobility," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 58(3), pages 531-548, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.