Author
Abstract
[spa] Los agentes estatales mas numerosos en el sur que en el norte - Si se averigua inútil el pretender, mediante un aproche estadistico, explicar adecuadamente las implantaciones de un determinado servicio público, cuando menos es factible subrayar algunos factores repetitivos que encarrilan a pensar que algunas regiones gozan de una situación más bien privilegiada con relación a otras. Globalmente, es decir al reagrupar todos los servicios examinados, Francia se divide claramente en tres zonas : la primera, la que se beneficia de un número relativamente elevado de agentes estatales, se situa por debajo de una linea Burdeos-Ginebra; la segunda, constituida por las regiones más desfavorecidas, se extiende al norte de una linea Rouen-Ginebra; la tercera, incluida entre ambas Kneas, presenta una situación que se asemeja al promedio provincial, con excepción de la region del Loire, la cual es más bien parecida al grupo de las regiones menos agraciadas. Las desemejanzas de situación son, a menudo, considerables entre regiones; la region Mediodía- Pirineo que parece ser la más favorecida se beneficia de un exceso de agentes estatales que alcanza casi un 20 %, habida cuenta de las normas en usanza en Francia provincial. En cambio la region de Franche-Comté que se halla situada al otro extremo de la escala presenta un deficit que supera el 10 %. [fre] S'il est vain de prétendre, par une approche statistique, expliquer correctement les implantations d'un service public particulier, du moins peut-on soulignercertainsfacteurs répétitifs qui conduisent à penser que quelques régions jouissent d'une situation plutôt avantageuse par rapport aux autres. Globalement, c'est-à-dire en regroupant tous les services étudiés, la France se divise nettement en trois zones : la première — celle qui bénéficie d'un nombre relativement élevé d'agents de l'État — se situe au-dessous d'une ligne Bordeaux -Genève; la seconde, constituée des régions les plus défavorisées, s'étale au nord d'une ligne Rouen-Gevève; la troisième, comprise entre ces deux lignes, présente une situation proche de la moyenne provinciale, à l'exception de la région Loire qui se rattache plutôt au groupe des régions les plus mal loties. Les différences de situation sont parfois considérables entre les régions; la région Midi -Pyrénées, qui semble la plus favorisée, bénéficie d'un « excédent » en agents de l'État qui approche 20 %, compte tenu des normes en usage dans la France de province. En revanche, la région Franche-Comté, qui est située à l'autre bout de l'échelle est en déficit de plus de 10 %. [eng] Civil servant and contractual state personnel are more numerous in the South than in the North - If, on one hand, it is useless to try to explain correctly, from a statistical point of view, the setting up of a particular public service in a given area, at least one can bring out. certain factors that are constantly repeated. This leads to believe that certain regions enjoy a priviledged position when compared to others. When lookingat all the services studied, France is clearly divided into three zones: the first — which has a relatively high number of civil servants and contractual state personnel — is located south of an imaginary line drawn from Bordeaux to Geneva; the second, made up of regions less priviledged, is spread out north of the line from Rouen to Geneva; the third zone, located between these two lines, gives a profile close to the provincial average, with the exception of the Loire region which is linked rather to the group of regions the least provided for. The different positions are sometimes considerable between regions; the Midi - Pyrenees region, which seems the most priviledged, enjoys an «excess» of civil servants and| contractual state personnel approaching 20%, having taken into account the norms used in provincial France. On the contrary, the Franche-Comté region, located at the other end of the ladder, has a deficit of more than 10 %.
Suggested Citation
Jean Lemattre, 1980.
"Les agents de l'État plus nombreux au sud qu'au nord,"
Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 121(1), pages 27-34.
Handle:
RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1980_num_121_1_4344
DOI: 10.3406/estat.1980.4344
Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1980.4344
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1980_num_121_1_4344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.