IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_129_3_5875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'équité dans le modèle de "concurrence organisée" pour la régulation d'un système de santé

Author

Listed:
  • Maryse Gadreau
  • Claude Schneider-Bunner

Abstract

[eng] Equity in the "Planned Competition" Model of Regulating a Health System by Maryse Gadreau and Claude Schneider-Bunner . The distributive logic of European health systems (contribution depending on income and use depending on need) is indicative of the importance attached to the principle of equal access to health-care. However, reforms introducing competition are arousing interest in Europe and have been piloted in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. To what extent is equity still maintained? This paper uses a threefold typology of justice theories (egalitarian, liberal and Rawlsian) to analyse the "planned competition" model and its European pilots. The underlying conception of equity is ambiguous: all three dimensions are present, indicating the hesitations of equity policy and reflecting the pluralism of the principles in whose name the health system players are acting. [fre] L'équité dans le modèle de "concurrence organisée" pour la régulation d'un système de santé par Maryse Gadreau et Claude Schneider-Bunner . La logique distributive des systèmes de santé européens (contribution selon les moyens, utilisation selon les besoins) est significative de l'importance accordée au principe d'égalité d'accès aux soins. Pourtant, des réformes introduisant la concurrence suscitent l'intérêt en Europe et ont été expérimentées au Royaume-Uni et aux Pays-Bas. Dans quelle mesure l'objectif d'équité reste-t-il atteint ? Cet article se propose d'évaluer, à l'aide d'une typologie des théories de la justice en trois pôles -égalitariste, libéral, rawlsien- le modèle de " concurrence organisée " et ses expérimentations européennes. La conception de l'équité sous-jacente est ambiguë : les trois dimensions sont présentes, témoignant des hésitations de la politique d'équité et reflétant le pluralisme des principes au nom desquels les acteurs des systèmes de santé agissent.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryse Gadreau & Claude Schneider-Bunner, 1997. "L'équité dans le modèle de "concurrence organisée" pour la régulation d'un système de santé," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 221-237.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_129_3_5875
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1997.5875
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1997.5875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1997.5875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_129_3_5875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1997.5875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Mougeot, 1993. "Concurrence et incitations dans le système hospitalier," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 8(2), pages 109-131.
    2. Claire Lachaud & Lise Rochaix, 1995. "Équité dans le financement et la prestation de soins de santé en Europe," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(3), pages 367-393.
    3. Jacques Chaperon & Lise Rochaix, 1996. "Les réformes du service national de santé britannique : la fin d'un mythe ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 291(1), pages 87-102.
    4. Rawls, John, 1974. "Some Reasons for the Maximin Criterion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 141-146, May.
    5. Fleurbaey, Marc, 1995. "Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 25-55, April.
    6. Fleurbaey, Marc, 1995. "Equality and responsibility," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 683-689, April.
    7. Philippe VAN PARIJS, 1990. "Equal Endowments as Undominated Diversity," Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) 1990034, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maniquet, Francois, 1998. "An equal right solution to the compensation-responsibility dilemma," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 185-202, March.
    2. Alexander Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden, 2009. "Rewarding effort," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 39(3), pages 425-441, June.
      • Cappelen, Alexander W. & Tungodden, Bertil, 2004. "Rewarding effort," Memorandum 15/2004, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    3. Sayaka Sakoda, 2022. "Estimating economic unfairness in Japan and policies toward fairness," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 85-111, February.
    4. Bertil Tungodden, 2004. "Some Reflections on the Role of Moral Reasoning in Economics," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 30, pages 49-59.
    5. Alexander Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden, 2007. "Local autonomy and interregional equality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 28(3), pages 443-460, April.
    6. Cappelen, Alexander W. & Tungodden, Bertil, 2006. "A Liberal Egalitarian Paradox," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 393-408, November.
    7. Donal O'Neill & Olive Sweetman & Dirk van de gaer, 1999. "Equality of Opportunity and Kernel Density Estimation: An Application to Intergenerational Mobility," Economics Department Working Paper Series n950999, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    8. Giuseppe Arbia & Maria Lucia Pace, 2018. "Testing inequality of opportunities in Italy using the ANOVA framework," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 297-322, August.
    9. Dolan, Paul & Tsuchiya, Aki, 2009. "The social welfare function and individual responsibility: Some theoretical issues and empirical evidence," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 210-220, January.
    10. Bertil Tungodden, 2005. "Responsibility and redistribution: The case of first best taxation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 24(1), pages 33-44, June.
    11. Maria Lucia Pace, 2016. "Un test per la diseguaglianza delle opportunit? dovuta a fattori regionali," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 113-143.
    12. Didier Blanchet, 1996. "La référence assurantielle en matière de protection sociale : apports et limites," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 291(1), pages 33-45.
    13. Denis Maguain, 2002. "Les théories de la justice distributive post-rawlsiennes. Une revue de la littérature," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 53(2), pages 165-199.
    14. Duclos, Jean-Yves, 2006. "Liberté ou égalité?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 82(4), pages 441-476, décembre.
    15. Fehr, Ernst & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Sutter, Matthias, 2013. "The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 369-383.
    16. Pierre Pestieau & Maria Racionero, 2015. "Tagging with leisure needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 687-706, December.
    17. Lefranc, Arnaud & Pistolesi, Nicolas & Trannoy, Alain, 2009. "Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(11-12), pages 1189-1207, December.
    18. Faravelli, Marco, 2007. "How context matters: A survey based experiment on distributive justice," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(7-8), pages 1399-1422, August.
    19. Marco Mariotti & Roberto Veneziani, 2018. "Opportunities as Chances: Maximising the Probability that Everybody Succeeds," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(611), pages 1609-1633, June.
    20. Felipe Rivera, 2017. "Health opportunities in Colombia," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 87, pages 125-164, Julio - D.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_129_3_5875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.