IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_119_3_5732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transport aérien : bilan de l'expérience américaine de libéralisation et leçon pour l'Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Kenigswald

Abstract

[ger] Luftverkehr: Bilanz des amerikanischen Liberalisierungsexperiments und Lehren fur Europa . von Laurent Kenigswald . Die fur den 1. April 1997 vorgesehene vollstandige Liberalisierung des europaischen Luftverkehrs diirfte zu einer umfassenden Umstrukturierung des Angebots, einer Senkung der Preise und einer Dynamisierung der Nachfrage fuhren. Diese Prognosen, die im iibrigen von der groBen Mehrheit der Fachleute des Luftverkehrs geteilt werden, stiitzen sich auf die Analyse der tiefgreifenden Umwalzungen, die in den Vereinigten Staaten seit mehr als funfzehn Jahren vonstatten gehen. Die meisten dieser Umwalzungen lassen sich in der Tat auf den europaischen Markt ubertragen: Zunahme der Wahlmôglichkeiten, Erweiterung der Preisschere und Senkung der durchschnittlichen Tarife. Allerdings kônnten sich die Modalitaten dieser Entwicklungen von denjenigen unterscheiden, die in den Vereinigten Staaten zutage getreten sind; denn sie wiirden weniger auf einer Neuorganisation der "Speichennetze" und mehr auf einer Senkung der Kosten der Gesellschaften, deren Wettbewerbsfahigkeit zu wiinschen tibrig laBt, beruhen. Wenn auch die Bilanz der Liberalisierung des amerikanischen Luftverkehrs weitgehend positiv ist, geht aus der Analyse dennoch hervor, daB der fur die Wettbewerbsregulierung zustandigen Behorde einige Fehler unterlaufen sind. Es wird Aufgabe der nationalen Regulierungsbehôrden und der Europaischen Kommission sein, eine Wiederholung dieser Fehler zu vermeiden, insbesondere indem sie die MaBnahmen vorsehen, die zu einer wirksamen Bekampfung von Staus am Himmel und auf manchen Flughafen erforderlich sind. [fre] Transport aérien : bilan de l'expérience américaine de libéralisation et leçon pour l'Europe . par Laurent Kenigswald . La libéralisation totale du ciel européen prévue le 1er avril 1997 devrait se traduire par une importante restructuration de l'offre, une baisse des prix et dynamisation de la demande. Ces prévisions, au demeurant partagés par la grande majorité des spécialistes du transport aérien, s'appuient sur l'analyse des profondes mutations intervenues aux États-Unis depuis plus de quinze ans. La plupart de ces mutations sont en effet transposables au marché européen : augmentation des possibilités de choix, élargissement de l'éventail des prix et baisse des tarifs moyens. Les modalités de ces évolutions pourraient toutefois différer de celles qui ont été relevées aux États-Unis : elles s'appuieraient moins sur une réorganisation des réseaux "en étoiles" et plus sur une baisse des coûts des compagnies dont la compétitivité laisse à désirer. Si le bilan de la libéralisation du ciel américain est largement positif, l'analyse fait toutefois apparaître certains "ratés" de l'organisme chargé de réguler la concurrence. Il appartiendra aux autorités nationales de régulation et à la Commission européenne d' éviter de reproduire ces erreurs, notamment en se donnant les moyens de lutter efficacement contre la congestion du ciel et de certains aéroports. [spa] Transporte aéreo: balance de la experiencia americana de liberalizadôn y ensenanzas para Europa . por Laurent Kenigswald . La plena liberalizadôn del trafico aéreo europeo prevista para el 1 ero de abril de 1 997 deberîa traducirse en una importante reestructuraciôn de la oferta, una disminucion de los precios y dinamizaciôn de la demanda. Estas previsiones, hasta aqui compartidas por la gran mayorîa de los especialistas del transporte aéreo, se apoyan en el anâlisis de las profiindas mutaciones intervenidas en los Estados Unidos desde hace mas de quince anos. La mayorîa de estas mutaciones pueden en efecto transponerse al caso del mercado europeo: aumento de las posibilidades de elecciôn, extenciôn del abanico de precios y disminucion de las tarifas promedio. Los razgos ( las caracterîsticas ) de estas evoluciones podrîan sin embargo diferir de aquellas que se registraron en los Estados Unidos: estarîan menos sustentadas en una reorganizaciôn de las redes radiales y mas en una disminucion de los costos de las companfas cuya competitividad déjà mucho que desear. Si el balance de la liberalizaciôn del trâfïco aéreo americano es en gran parte positivo, el anâlisis muestra ciertas "insuficiencias"("baches") del organismo encargado de regular la competencia. Sera del dominio de las autoridades nacionales de regulation y de la Comisiôn europea el evitar la repeticiôn de estos errores, especialmente dotandose de medios para luchar contra la congestion del trafico aéreo y de ciertos aeropuertos. [eng] Air Transport: Review of the American Liberalization Experience and a Lesson for Europe . by Laurent Kenigswald . The complete liberalization of the European skies scheduled for 1 April 1997 should take the form of a substantial restructuring of the supply, a drop in prices and a stimulation of demand. These forecasts, shared by the vast majority of air transport specialists, are based on the analysis of the extensive changes made in the United States over more than fifteen years. Most of these changes can be transposed to the European market: greater choice, widening of the price range and decrease in average rates. The ways in which these changes are made could nevertheless differ from those observed in the United States. They will probably rely less on a reorganization of the networks into a hub and spoke system and more on a decrease in the costs of insufficiently competitive airlines. Although the assessment of the liberalization of the American skies is largely positive, the analysis reveals certain "failures" by the body in charge of regulating competition. The national regulatory authorities and the European Commission will have to avoid reproducing these errors, in particular by finding the means to effectively curb congestion in the sky and certain airports.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Kenigswald, 1995. "Transport aérien : bilan de l'expérience américaine de libéralisation et leçon pour l'Europe," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 119(3), pages 73-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_119_3_5732
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1995.5732
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1995.5732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1995.5732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_119_3_5732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1995.5732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borenstein, Severin, 1990. "Airline Mergers, Airport Dominance, and Market Power," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 400-404, May.
    2. Robert J. Gordon, 1992. "Productivity in the Transportation Sector," NBER Chapters, in: Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, pages 371-427, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Bailey, Elizabeth E, 1986. "Price and Productivity Change Following Deregulation: The U.S. Experience," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 96(381), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Morrison, Steven A & Winston, Clifford, 1990. "The Dynamics of Airline Pricing and Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 389-393, May.
    5. Kahn, Alfred E, 1988. "Surprises of Airline Deregulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(2), pages 316-322, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Severin Borenstein, 1992. "The Evolution of U.S. Airline Competition," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 45-73, Spring.
    2. David Encaoua, 1996. "Ouverture à la concurrence des activités en réseau. Le cas du transport aérien européen," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(6), pages 1269-1296.
    3. Böhme Enrico & Müller Christopher, 2011. "Searching for the Concentration-Price Effect in the German Movie Theater Industry," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 231(4), pages 479-493, August.
    4. Encaoua, David & Moreaux, Michel & Perrot, Anne, 1996. "Compatibility and competition in airlines demand side network effects," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 701-726, October.
    5. Arano, Kathleen G. & Blair, Benjamin F., 2008. "An ex-post welfare analysis of natural gas regulation in the industrial sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 789-806, May.
    6. Margaret Peteraf & Randal Reed, 2008. "Regulatory reform and managerial choice: an analysis of the cost savings from airline deregulation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2-3), pages 99-116.
    7. Katsigiannis, Fotios A. & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2023. "Incorporating slot valuation in making airport slot scheduling decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 436-454.
    8. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Christos Genakos & Andreas Lamprinidis & James Walker, 2023. "Evaluating merger effects," CEP Discussion Papers dp1921, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Claudio A. Piga, 2007. "Entry and Exit in a Liberalised Market," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 97(1), pages 3-38, January-F.
    11. Gayle, Philip G. & Wu, Chi-Yin, 2013. "A re-examination of incumbents’ response to the threat of entry: Evidence from the airline industry," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 119-130.
    12. Desgranges, Gabriel & Gauthier, Stéphane, 2016. "Rationalizability and efficiency in an asymmetric Cournot oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 163-176.
    13. Damien J. Neven & Lars-Hendrik Röller & Zhentang Zhang, 1997. "Union Power and Product Market Competition: Evidence from the Airline Industry," CIG Working Papers FS IV 97-38, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    14. Michael Mazzeo, 2003. "Competition and Service Quality in the U.S. Airline Industry," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 22(4), pages 275-296, June.
    15. Claessens,Constantijn A. & Djankov, Simeon, 1998. "Politicians and firms in seven central and eastern European countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1954, The World Bank.
    16. David Margolis, 2006. "Should employment authorities worry about mergers and acquisitions?," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 5(2), pages 167-194, August.
    17. Fukui, Hideki, 2019. "How do slot restrictions affect airfares? New evidence from the US airline industry," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 51-71.
    18. Robert Town & Douglas Wholey & Roger Feldman & Lawton R. Burns, 2006. "The Welfare Consequences of Hospital Mergers," NBER Working Papers 12244, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Karen Ruckman & Nilesh Saraf & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2015. "Market Positioning by IT Service Vendors Through Imitation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 100-126, March.
    20. Ariane Charpin & Joanna Piechucka, 2020. "Merger Efficiency Gains: Evidence from a Large Transport Merger in France," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1843, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_119_3_5732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.