Author
Abstract
[eng] Three positions, shared in common by both authors, allow to associate them in heterodoxy. 1. They lay the foundations of a dynamic analysis. The circuit and the neutral economy are images of a static approach, showing that the latter embodies neither the entrepreneur, nor credit. 2. They build a production economy, which is different from the exchange economy. For Schumpeter, the entrepreneur is the active factor of evolution, because he innovates while carrying out new combinations, the financing of which requires the use of credit. For Keynes, the entrepreneur anticipates the demand which calls for variable output and employment, and, taking into account a non-probabil- zed future, he uses credit to make the advance of wages and incomes which will allow realized production to be purchased. 3. Both authors conceive a monetary economy, characterized by the main following variables : capital, interest, and, for Keynes, wages and prices ; those phenomena are monetary ones, distinct from real phenomena. [fre] Trois positions communes aux deux auteurs permettent de les associer dans l'hétérodoxie. 1. Ils élaborent les fondements d'une dynamique. Le circuit et l'économie neutre sont des images de la statique montrant que celle-ci ne connaft ni l'entrepreneur, ni le crédit. 2. Ils construisent une économie de production différente de l'économie d'échange. Pour Schumpeter, l'entrepreneur est le facteur actif de l'évolution car il innove en exécutant les combinaisons nouvelles dont le financement exige le recours au crédit. Pour Keynes, l'entrepreneur anticipe la demande justifiant une production et un emploi variables et fait, grâce au crédit, les avances de salaires et de revenus qui permettront l'achat de la production réalisée, en fonction d'un futur non probabilisable. 3. Ils conçoivent une économie monétaire, caractérisée par les variables majeures : capital, intérêt, et pour Keynes, salaires et prix, qui sont des phénomènes monétaires, distincts des phénomènes réels.
Suggested Citation
Alain Barrère, 1985.
"Keynes et Schumpeter ou l'hétérodoxie des fondements analytiques,"
Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 10(1), pages 91-113.
Handle:
RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1985_num_10_1_1000
DOI: 10.3406/cep.1985.1000
Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.1985.1000
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1985_num_10_1_1000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.