IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2011y2011i1id294p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Různé pohledy na otázku: Mohou stroje myslet?

Author

Listed:
  • Ondřej Vadinský

Abstract

This paper deals with the question, whether machines can think. Changes in thematisation of the question by several philosophers and scientists such as Cartesian dualism, Turing test, Searle's Chinese room argument, artificial neural networks of the Curchlands and Rapaport's abstraction and implementation and syntactic semantics are followed. The paper then shows what are the differences and similarities of such thematisations. Then it asks what is the nature of the relation between thought and its manifestation, which is the cornerstone of the Turing test. Furthermore the paper accents the need of combining suitable distinctive capacities with appropriate complexity to reach adequate analogy in the Chinese room argument. In the end the paper deals with relationship among duplication, abstraction and implementation of thought.

Suggested Citation

  • Ondřej Vadinský, 2011. "Různé pohledy na otázku: Mohou stroje myslet?," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(1), pages 1-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2011:y:2011:i:1:id:294:p:1-24
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.294.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.294.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2011:y:2011:i:1:id:294:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.