IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2010y2010i1id282p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problematičnost základní teze Humova empirismu

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Špecián

Abstract

The article analyzes the basic assumptions of Hume's empiricism as it is developed in A Treatise of Human Nature and tries to shed light on their dubiousness. There is Hume's primary thesis explaining the relation between impressions and ideas in the centre of the attention - particularly with respect to the question of possibility of general assertions (which is the same with the question of the status of logic in Hume's philosophical system), the question of the legitimacy of the distinction between ideas and impressions and the question of difference between the mind and the consciousness. Inspired by the Husserlian critique on Hume and after having further developed these three fundamental questions, the article comes to detection of hidden metaphysical dualistic premises of the system of Treatise which hinder the Humean skepticism to dissolve all conceivable knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Špecián, 2010. "Problematičnost základní teze Humova empirismu," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(1), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2010:y:2010:i:1:id:282:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.282.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.282.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2010:y:2010:i:1:id:282:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.