IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2006y2006i1id193p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Two Arrows of Efficiency: A Commentary on Konstantin S. Khroutski's BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen M. Modell

Abstract

Konstantin S. Khroutski (E-Logos 2006) has proposed a "Science of the Universal Future" moving away from an objectivist emphasis on evolutionary struggle espoused in current paradigms of understanding, and towards a comprehension of the universe as subjective and collaborative towards personal and universal ends. He argues that individuals are born with an inherent health design, which he labels their "basic cosmist functionality" (BCF). Contemporary science has drifted away from, and is actually adverse to arguments for design in nature, thus the need to explore more deeply what functionality means from a combined philosophicalscientific perspective. In this review I look at classical notions of causality in natural process through the eyes of philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Bertrand Russell. Among his four types of causes, Aristotle's notion of efficient cause is accepted as the most viable alternative for explaining universal process. Mechanisms of causal efficiency operate in the immediate future to instigate change and in the immediate past to finalize change at every point as the individual advances through time. Teleology can be interpreted as the operation of physical and biological laws as well as more gross patterns of process in chaotic, complex, and living systems, which shape changes in the individual within the openness of the present moment. Modern science is capable of discerning bio-psychological and existential patterns that optimally fit the individual if health is to be maintained. The analysis concludes that a universe with occupants possessing personal functionality can be explained by causal efficiency connecting the open present with a naturally organizing immediate future and past, thus avoiding conflicts over design.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen M. Modell, 2006. "The Two Arrows of Efficiency: A Commentary on Konstantin S. Khroutski's BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1), pages 1-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2006:y:2006:i:1:id:193:p:1-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/artkey/elg-200601-0004.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/pdfs/elg/2006/01/04.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantin S. Khroutski, 2006. "BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1), pages 1-32.
    2. K.S. Khroutski, 2006. "BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C. Guja, 2008. "Biocosmology and Informational Anthropology: Some Common Aspects," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(1).
    2. Konstantin S. Khroutski, 2007. "Arousing a Dispute over BioCosmology. A Reply to Stephen Modell," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-39.
    3. Stephen M. Modell, 2009. "Aristotelian Train of Thought in BioCosmology," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Arthur Saniotis, 2007. "A Reconnaissance of the Cosmos: A Critical Response to Konstantin S. Khroutski's BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-14.
    5. Arthur Saniotis, 2007. "'Recombinant Nature': Transgenics and the Emergence of Hum-animals," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-20.
    6. Cornelia Guja, 2008. "BioCosmology and Informational Anthropology: Some Common Aspects," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(1), pages 1-12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Saniotis, 2007. "'Recombinant Nature': Transgenics and the Emergence of Hum-animals," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Cornelia Guja, 2008. "BioCosmology and Informational Anthropology: Some Common Aspects," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(1), pages 1-12.
    3. C. Guja, 2008. "Biocosmology and Informational Anthropology: Some Common Aspects," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(1).
    4. Konstantin S. Khroutski, 2007. "Arousing a Dispute over BioCosmology. A Reply to Stephen Modell," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-39.
    5. Arthur Saniotis, 2007. "A Reconnaissance of the Cosmos: A Critical Response to Konstantin S. Khroutski's BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-14.
    6. Stephen M. Modell, 2009. "Aristotelian Train of Thought in BioCosmology," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(1), pages 1-16.
    7. S. M. Modell, 2006. "The Two Arrows of Efficiency: A Commentary on Konstantin S. Khroutski's BioCosmology - Science of the Universal Future," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2006:y:2006:i:1:id:193:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.