K pojetí "šifer transcendence" ve filosofii K. Jasperse z pohledu fenomenologicko-ontologického a fenomenologicko-antropologického

This study follows on my study "About the conception of "ciphers of transcendence" in K. Jaspers' philosophy from the point of view of phenomenological ontology and phenomenological anthropology" (see E-Logos 2002) and demonstrates more closely anthropological and ontological value of the conception of "ciphers of transcendence" in K. Jaspers' philosophy from the point of view of phenomenological ontology and phenomenological anthropology but above all demonstrates its anthropological and ontological ambiguities concerning his conception of "ciphers of transcendence" in relation to transcendence (i. e. essential source of "ciphers of transcendence" in relation to transcendence, essential statut of "ciphers of transcendence" in relation to transcendence, "ciphers of transcendence" in relation to appearances of transcendence, and the world as a "cipher of transcendence" in relation to the world as an appearance of transcendence) as well as his conception both of "ciphers of transcendence" in relation to "philosophical belief" (i. e. "philosophical belief" as a witness to God as transcendence for a man, "philosophical belief" as bearing of a man upon God as transcendence, "philosophical belief" - as a bearing of a man upon God as transcendence - as a source of authentic existence in contrast to non-authentic existence, and "philosophical belief" and leading a man by God as transcendence) and of "ciphers of transcendence" in relation to philosophy (i. e. philosophy as philosophical anthropology, philosophical anthropology as anti-ontology, ontology as a false philosophy, and theology as a false philosophy), and ensueing from its inner ambiguity as such; its inner ambiguity namely consists in the fact that it is both (admitted and accented) philosophical anthropology and (non-admitted and hidden) theological ontology.