IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pos/journl/53-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Практичні Питання Застосування Ст. 185-3 Кодексу України Про Адміністративні Правопорушення (Прояв Неповаги До Суду) При Здійсненні Судочинства
[Practical Questions of Implementation of Art. 185-3 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (Disrespect of the Court) in Judicial Proceedings]

Author

Listed:
  • Nadiia Konovalova
  • Ruslan Skrynkovskyy

    (Lviv University of Business and Law)

Abstract

The article presents a scientific and practical commentary to Art. 185-3 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (disrespect of the court), formulates some conclusions and suggests some recommendations for legislative regulation of legal liability for showing disrespect of the court (judges) in Ukraine, including the following: 1. One of the mechanisms for ensuring the independence of court (judge) is a proper response to the disrespect of the court (judges). Respect of the court and judges (both as a social and a legal value) is a factor of the proper functioning of a legal state. 2. The Constitution of Ukraine (Article 129) directly states that a person is considered guilty and is held liable for disrespect or evident contempt of the court (judges). This constitutional provision corresponds in full with other normative legal acts of Ukraine, in particular, with the requirements of Art. 50 of the current Law of Ukraine “On Judicial System and the Status of Judges”, according to which any expression of disrespect of the court (judge) by the individuals who are parties to the trial (case) or are present in the courtroom, presupposes the responsibility, established by the law. Today in Ukraine, disrespect of the court (judges) is not considered a crime against justice. Administrative liability is provided for committing this offense in accordance with Art. 185-3 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. 3. Taking into account the fact that the terms “court” and “judge” are not identical, and also considering the normative peculiarities of the elements of administrative offense, provided for in Art. 185-3 of the current Code of Administrative Offenses, the title of this article needs some clarification, namely: “Manifestation of disrespect of the court (judges) in the course of judicial proceedings”. Here the word “manifestation” should be used in the plural, not the singular. 4. Part 1 of Art. 185-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses shall be amended and specified as follows: “1. Contempt of the court (judges), expressed in malicious evasion of attending the court by a witness, a victim, a plaintiff, a defendant or in disobedience of the specified people and other citizens to the order of the presiding judge or in violation of the order during the court session, as well as committing any actions which indicate a clear contempt of the court (judges) or rules established in court ... ”. 5. The recommendations of theoretical and practical nature, in particular, regarding the introduction of appropriate changes (clarifications) and additions to part 1 of Art. 185-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, as well as practical issues of development and implementation of the uniform “Rules of Conduct for Citizens in Court”, which should be adopted as a separate supplement to the current Law of Ukraine “On Judicial System and the Status of Judges”, and relevant developments (in this area) aim to increase the effectiveness of legal liability for disrespect of the court (judges) and to promote more effective protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens participating in the judicial process in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadiia Konovalova & Ruslan Skrynkovskyy, 2019. "Практичні Питання Застосування Ст. 185-3 Кодексу України Про Адміністративні Правопорушення (Прояв Неповаги До Суду) При Здійсненні Судочинства [Practical Questions of Implementation of Art. 185-3 ," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 5(12), pages 1001-1010, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pos:journl:53-1
    DOI: 10.22178/pos.53-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/download/695/681
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22178/pos.53-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    court; judge; disrespect of court (judges); trial; litigants; the rule of law; the authority of the judiciary power; administrative responsibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pos:journl:53-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrey Kataev (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pathofscience.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.