IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v9y2021p461-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital democracy in Peril. Safeguarding edemocracy by boosting cybersecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Claudiu Mihai CODREANU

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

New technological developments and the digitalization of public life were not long ago thought to lay the foundation to a new step for liberal democracies all over the world, with the prospects of e-democracy and e- government. However, state-sponsored cyber operations held back progress in boosting e-democracy, and so did online disinformation campaigns, leading to a change in perception that digital technology will actually be detrimental to liberal democracies. Moreover, major illiberal and authoritarian state actors exploited cyberspace and engaged in using and exporting digital authoritarianism. The main objective of this paper is exploring the close relationship between e-democracy and cybersecurity, arguing that without sound cybersecurity policies and practices, digital democracy is in peril. Furthermore, I shall discuss the role of the state in cyberspace, focusing on the European Union, and argue for a set of cybersecurity policies that enhance the level of security while also safeguarding the values and gains of e-democracy, taking into account relevant literature on this topic and also EU s 2020 cybersecurity strategy. Current research and strategic documents suggest three main courses of action for enhancing e-democracy in a safe way in a cyberspace dominated by malicious activities: developing a sort of digital autonomy, securing critical infrastructure and maintaining a free and open Internet. The main contribution of this paper is facilitating the discussion on the relationship between e-democracy and cybersecurity, because as close as they are, as little they are linked together in relevant research. Furthermore, this paper should be relevant both for civil practitioners in the fields of public administration and cybersecurity and for academia, as it focuses on an issue that has become to be of utmost importance for liberal democracies. The final argument of the paper is that the whole digital democratic process should be considered critical infrastructure and shielded by proper cybersecurity measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudiu Mihai CODREANU, 2021. "Digital democracy in Peril. Safeguarding edemocracy by boosting cybersecurity," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9, pages 461-474, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:461-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/387/352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/387
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zach Bastick, 2017. "Digital Limits of Government: The Failure of E-Democracy," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Alois A. Paulin & Leonidas G. Anthopoulos & Christopher G. Reddick (ed.), Beyond Bureaucracy, pages 3-14, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Al Fauzi RAHMAT & Catalin VRABIE & Galih Bagas SOESILO, 2023. "Exploring the Cybercrime Prevention Campaign on Twitter Evidence from the Indonesian Government," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 9-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Demokratie in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 331-349.
    2. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital democracy; edemocracy; cybersecurity; cyberattacks; European Union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:461-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.