IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v11y2023p77-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a smart democracy: increased trust in political leaders

Author

Listed:
  • Irina-Ana DROBOT

    (Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, Romania, Faculty of Engineering in Foreign Languages, Department of Foreign Languages and Communication)

Abstract

Among the objectives of the present paperwe can mention finding an answer as to how the democracy has been changing in order to adapt to the contemporary world and to the contemporary needs. How can technology help us, and how can technology make the distance between the people and the elites orthose in power become smaller? Prior work includes papers by Walters (2011) and Scholl & Scholl (2014), discussing the way that electronic, or smart governance can lead on to a new dimension of democracy, that of smart democracy. Hofsted`s (2011) cultural dimensions will also be used. The approach will consist of the cultural dimensions of individualism, rising worldwide, and that of lowering power distance, as the world tends towards liberal democracy as an ideal form of government and on the wish towards people becoming equal. The results show that there is more trust in the political leaders with a smart democracy tools. As the information is laid bare through technology, there may be less worries about corruption and manipulation. Among the Implications, we can see an improvement of the liberal democracy with adapting it to the needs and opportunities of the world today. The value of the paper consists in understanding the dimensions of individualism, low power distance and liberalism through the use of technology. Technology helps against the fears of people of corruption, which has been the driving force of protests in Romania quite recently. While these seem general ideas which have been around throughout history, they are achieving a new dimension within thesmart city, where we have a higher level of security due to the presence of web cameras for surveillance, and where all systems of bureaucracy and politics, have become openly available due to the possibilities offered by technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina-Ana DROBOT, 2023. "Towards a smart democracy: increased trust in political leaders," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 11, pages 77-86, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:11:y:2023:p:77-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/484/446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/484
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Encarnação, Sara & Santos, Fernando P. & Santos, Francisco C. & Blass, Vered & Pacheco, Jorge M. & Portugali, Juval, 2018. "Paths to the adoption of electric vehicles: An evolutionary game theoretical approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 24-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Chen & Huang, Yongchun & Hu, Shiliang & Huang, Zhan, 2023. "Government participation in low-carbon technology transfer: An evolutionary game study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Li-cai Lei & Shang Gao & En-yu Zeng, 2020. "Regulation strategies of ride-hailing market in China: an evolutionary game theoretic perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 535-563, September.
    3. Huang, Xingjun & Lin, Yun & Lim, Ming K. & Zhou, Fuli & Liu, Feng, 2022. "Electric vehicle charging station diffusion: An agent-based evolutionary game model in complex networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2022. "A multi-level optimization model of infrastructure-dependent technology adoption: Overcoming the chicken-and-egg problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 755-770.
    5. Shandong Mou & Kexin Zhong & Yamin Ma, 2023. "Regulating the Big Data-Based Discriminatory Pricing in Platform Retailing: A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Tan, Bing Qing & Kang, Kai & Zhong, Ray Y., 2023. "Electric vehicle charging infrastructure investment strategy analysis: State-owned versus private parking lots," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 54-71.
    7. Nie, Qingyun & Zhang, Lihui & Tong, Zihao & Hubacek, Klaus, 2022. "Strategies for applying carbon trading to the new energy vehicle market in China: An improved evolutionary game analysis for the bus industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Zhu, Chaoping & Fan, Ruguo & Lin, Jinchai, 2020. "The impact of renewable portfolio standard on retail electricity market: A system dynamics model of tripartite evolutionary game," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Liu, Weihua & Long, Shangsong & Xie, Dong & Liang, Yanjie & Wang, Jinkun, 2021. "How to govern the big data discriminatory pricing behavior in the platform service supply chain?An examination with a three-party evolutionary game model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Zhao, Chuan & Ma, Xuying & Wang, Kun, 2022. "The electric vehicle promotion in the cold-chain logistics under two-sided support policy: An evolutionary game perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 14-34.
    11. Yujing Si & Yi Yang & Ze Shao, 2024. "Research on Green Design Strategy of Electrical and Electronic Manufacturing Enterprises Based on the Perspective of Tripartite Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Zhao, Tian & Liu, Zhixin, 2019. "A novel analysis of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology adoption: An evolutionary game model between stakeholders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Li, Junqiang & Ren, Hao & Wang, Mingyue, 2021. "How to escape the dilemma of charging infrastructure construction? A multi-sectorial stochastic evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Huang, Xingjun & Lin, Yun & Lim, Ming K. & Zhou, Fuli & Ding, Rui & Zhang, Zusheng, 2022. "Evolutionary dynamics of promoting electric vehicle-charging infrastructure based on public–private partnership cooperation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    15. JiWen Chai & LiHao Wang, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of big data discriminatory pricing diffusion based on the supervision of relevant interest parties," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2094-2101, June.
    16. Fan, Ruguo & Bao, Xuguang & Du, Kang & Wang, Yuanyuan & Wang, Yitong, 2022. "The effect of government policies and consumer green preferences on the R&D diffusion of new energy vehicles: A perspective of complex network games," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    17. Zhao, Tian & Liu, Zhixin & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2022. "Developing hydrogen refueling stations: An evolutionary game approach and the case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Shi, Yingying & Wei, Zixiang & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Zeng, Yongchao, 2021. "Exploring the dynamics of low-carbon technology diffusion among enterprises: An evolutionary game model on a two-level heterogeneous social network," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Xiaohui Wu & Ren He & Meiling He, 2021. "Chaos Analysis of Urban Low-Carbon Traffic Based on Game Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    20. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Jia, Mengyu & Wang, Lu & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Zhao, Xin & Ma, Xiaowei, 2022. "Modelling and simulation of a four-group evolutionary game model for green innovation stakeholders: Contextual evidence in lens of sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 500-517.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    individualism; liberalism; low power distance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:11:y:2023:p:77-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.