Author
Abstract
The objective of the paper is to present legal aspects of the concept and method of implementing an innovative solution such as an electronic document for Ukrainian citizens in Poland (Diia.pl), including some problems that arise in this context. This document is one of the elements of the Polish response to the arrival of millions of Ukrainian citizens seeking protection against the effects of the Russian invasion of February 2022. The fundamental research question is to what extent Diia.pl should be considered solely through the prism of technology and administration techniques, and to what extent - through the prism of human rights – in the context of real guarantees of respect for them. The study is a continuation of the authors' prior work in the field of migration law and informatization of public services. Research is approached using the dogmatic-legal method; it also includes an analysis of statistical data and positions of various bodies and institutions, as well as problems observed in practice. The result is a diagnosis of challenges related to the use of electronic residence documents, in the context of political and social crises. This, in turn, implies the formulation of guidelines for countries wishing to introduce this type of solutions based on accumulated experience. Implications of the study are of great importance for academics, researchers and practitioners, that is lawmakers, border services, administration, employees and other entities. Considering forecasts of an increase in forced migration in the future, drawing appropriate conclusions from the use of Diia.pl may contribute to efficient responses to inevitable crises in the future and in that sense is of great value for different stakeholders.
Suggested Citation
Justyna MATUSIAK & Agnieszka NAROZNIAK, 2025.
"Diia.pl: Navigating legal, technological and human rightsdimensions of an electronic document for Ukrainian citizens in Poland,"
Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9(2), pages 15-30, March.
Handle:
RePEc:pop:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:15-30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25019/nq2yrm66
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:15-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.