Author
Abstract
The main objective is to raise awareness of the importance of robust business continuity planning (BCP) in public institutions. It emphasizes how a well-designed BCP can increase an institution's ability to anticipate potential business interruptions, minimize eventual impacts, resume operations, and ensure basic services during unforeseen events such as natural disasters or pandemics.Prior Work: Reference is made to previous studies and practices dealing with BCM in public institutions. Among these, most are limited to theory and do not deal with BCM from a practical point of view. Many institutions are working with conventional BCM practices, even though new technologies and frameworks are opening up new opportunities.Approach: The method presented here focuses on the practice of BCM application in public institutions. Through case studies and interviews with public officials, approaches are demonstrated that maximize the continuity of blic service during unexpected events. The article also highlights the importance of new technologies and data-driven approaches for effective BCM. Results:The results show that effective application of BCM enables public institutions to respond quickly and efficiently to emergencies, minimize their impact, and provide recovery services. It is clear that a proactive, technology-and data-driven approach to BCM contributes significantly to its effectiveness.Value: The value of this article lies in emphasizing the practical application of BCM in public institutions and demonstrating how technology can be used to make BCM practices more effective. For public administrators and politicians, this article can serve as a guide for improving their BCPs and ensuring continued public service even in times of unavoidable disruption.
Suggested Citation
Christian SCHACHTNER, 2025.
"On the way to resilient information security management: Business Continuity Management (BCM) for public institutions,"
Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9(1), pages 7-15, January.
Handle:
RePEc:pop:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:7-15
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25019/dq18x683
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:7-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.