IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/journl/v6y2022i1p55-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General technological competency and usage in public administration education: An evaluation study considering on-the-job trainings and home studies

Author

Listed:
  • Judith KAUSCH-ZONGO

    (University of Applied Sciences -Public Administration and Finance, Ludwigsburg, Germany)

  • Birgit SCHENK

    (University of Applied Sciences -Public Administration and Finance, Ludwigsburg, Germany)

Abstract

According to the UN’s E-Government Development Index (EGDI 2020), which distinguishes between rating classes V1/V2/V3, it is part of Rating Class V3. When it comes to the digital maturity of Germany’s public administration the weaknesses have become blatantly obvious during the pandemic. Civil servants’ digital skills are one of the core prerequisites for digitalization in the public sector. Therefore, these skills need to play a key role in public administration education to prepare future civil servants for e-government. Since the first step towards digital skills is general technological competency, we are studying the level of general technological competency among public administration students. Whereas other studies focus on the information technology gap in public administration or on pedagogical aspects of technological skills, our study evaluates public administration students´general technological competency and usage. To do so we reflect different evaluation models and base our survey upon the EILAB's digital competency profiler (DCP) measuring digital readiness of individuals and groups. The case studied is a Public Administration University of Applied Sciences. The survey results show that e-learning (home studies) phases during the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed little to students´ technological competency and usage. On the contrary, competency and usage during on-the-job training phases in public organizations clearly differ to the off-the-job training phases at the University. Hence, the findings reveal a general technological competency and usage gap between the public administration education and the duties in public administration. Finally, the implications of general technological competency and usage in public administration education are presented and critically reflection based on the chosen EILAB model.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith KAUSCH-ZONGO & Birgit SCHENK, 2022. "General technological competency and usage in public administration education: An evaluation study considering on-the-job trainings and home studies," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 6(1), pages 55-65, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:55-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/120/94
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/120
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balázs Benjámin Budai & Sándor Csuhai & István Tózsa, 2023. "Digital Competence Development in Public Administration Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital skills; public administration education; e-government; digital readiness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:55-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.