IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v60y2015p176-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Remarks On The Art. 594 Para. 2 And 3 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Brindusa VARTOLOMEI

    (Assistant Professor, Phd, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, ROMANIA)

Abstract

While highlighting the novelty of character by the separate plea for annulment of certain categories of conclusion rendered by the arbitral tribunal, the study is criticizing the superficial references, void or unfounded, that the art. 594 of the Code of Civil Procedure has on the regime of the aforementioned separate pleas for annulment by refering to others provisions of Book IV of the Code of Civil Procedure

Suggested Citation

  • Brindusa VARTOLOMEI, 2015. "Critical Remarks On The Art. 594 Para. 2 And 3 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 60, pages 176-181, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:60:y:2015:p:176-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj15/recjurid151_14F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Action for annulment; separate action for annulment; pleas for annulment; conclusion of the arbitral tribunal attack.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:60:y:2015:p:176-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Bogdan Voaidas to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.