IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v60y2015p117-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Ombudsman: Facilitator Or Supervisor?

Author

Listed:
  • Crina RADULESCU

    (Jr., lecturer Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The European Ombudsman is an EU institution set up to investigate complaints about maladministration in the institutions and bodies of the European Union. It is entitled to receive and investigate complaints from EU citizens, businesses and organizations, and from anyone residing or having their registered office in an EU country. The Ombudsman may find maladministration if an institution fails to respect fundamental rights, legal rules or principles, or the principles of good administration. This covers administrative irregularities, unfairness, discrimination, abuse of power, failure to reply, refusal of information, and unnecessary delay, for example. Any citizen or resident of the EU, or business, association, or other body with a registered office in the EU, can lodge a complaint. Given the type of activities the Community performs, our main research question– is the institution of ombudsman in fact what the Community needs? Our research will underline the fact that the Community-level issues addressed by the Ombudsman are primarily in the area of control, i.e., directed towards general supervision instead of dispute settlement in individual cases. The analysis will reveal how an appropriately-designed ombudsman could provide such welcome improvements in Community governance as the following: more adequate external supervision of the Commission's administration; enforced Parliamentary supervision of executive rule-making by the Commission; and more regulation and supervision of the Committees involved in rule-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Crina RADULESCU, 2015. "The European Ombudsman: Facilitator Or Supervisor?," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 60, pages 117-127, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:60:y:2015:p:117-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj15/recjurid151_10F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radulescu, Crina, 2011. "The application of the principle of transparency in the decision-making process of public institutions. Case study: Romanian Ombudsman, Public Prosecutor's Office and the Committee on Petitions of the," Apas Papers 295, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      K40;

      JEL classification:

      • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:60:y:2015:p:117-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.