IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v57y2014p46-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues Related To The Exercise Of The Legality Control By The Prefect In The Decisions Of The Constitutional Court

Author

Listed:
  • Catalin-Silviu SARARU

    (Lecturer, Ph.D., Law Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Member of the Society of Comparative Legislation from Paris, President of the Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

This article examines some aspects of the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in the matter of the legality control exercised by the prefect on the local government acts. The article analyzes the acts which form the subject of the legality control exercised by the prefect, and the question which arises is whether the Prefect may challenge the administrative contracts at the administrative court. The article also tackles the theme of the law suspension of the administrative acts as contested at the administrative court of prefect in the exercise of the legality control. Finally it highlights the necessity to correlate the regulations that determine the competence of the prefect in the field of legality control.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin-Silviu SARARU, 2014. "Issues Related To The Exercise Of The Legality Control By The Prefect In The Decisions Of The Constitutional Court," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 57, pages 46-53, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:57:y:2014:p:46-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj14/recjurid142_4F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    prefect; legality control; the Constitutional Court of Romania; administrative contentious; administrative act; administrative contract.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:57:y:2014:p:46-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.