IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0260978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy, cost-minimization, and budget impact of a personalized discharge letter for basal cell carcinoma patients to reduce low-value follow-up care

Author

Listed:
  • Sven van Egmond
  • Ella D van Vliet
  • Marlies Wakkee
  • Loes M Hollestein
  • Xavier G L V Pouwels
  • Hendrik Koffijberg
  • Yesim Misirli
  • Rachel S L A Bakkum
  • Maarten T Bastiaens
  • Nicole A Kukutsch
  • Albert J Oosting
  • Elsemieke I Plasmeijer
  • Annik van Rengen
  • Kees-Peter de Roos
  • Tamar E C Nijsten
  • Esther de Vries
  • Esther W de Bekker-Grob

Abstract

Background: The incidence of keratinocyte carcinomas is high and rapidly growing. Approximately 80% of keratinocyte carcinomas consist of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) with 50% of these being considered as low-risk tumors. Nevertheless, 83% of the low-risk BCC patients were found to receive more follow-up care than recommended according to the Dutch BCC guideline, which is one visit post-treatment for this group. More efficient management could reduce unnecessary follow-up care and related costs. Objectives: To study the efficacy, cost-utility, and budget impact of a personalized discharge letter for low-risk BCC patients compared with usual care (no personalized letter). Methods: In a multi-center intervention study, a personalized discharge letter in addition to usual care was compared to usual care in first-time BCC patients. Model-based cost-utility and budget impact analyses were conducted, using individual patient data gathered via surveys. The outcome measures were number of follow-up visits, costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY) per patient. Results: A total of 473 first-time BCC patients were recruited. The personalized discharge letter decreased the number of follow-up visits by 14.8% in the first year. The incremental costs after five years were -€24.45 per patient. The QALYs were 4.12 after five years and very similar in both groups. The national budget impact was -€2,7 million after five years. Conclusions: The distribution of a personalized discharge letter decreases the number of unnecessary follow-up visits and implementing the intervention in a large eligible population would results in substantial cost savings, contributing to restraining the growing BCC costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven van Egmond & Ella D van Vliet & Marlies Wakkee & Loes M Hollestein & Xavier G L V Pouwels & Hendrik Koffijberg & Yesim Misirli & Rachel S L A Bakkum & Maarten T Bastiaens & Nicole A Kukutsch & Al, 2022. "Efficacy, cost-minimization, and budget impact of a personalized discharge letter for basal cell carcinoma patients to reduce low-value follow-up care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260978
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260978
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260978&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0260978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.