IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0259916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Atrial fibrillation detection in outpatient electrocardiogram monitoring: An algorithmic crowdsourcing approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Bahrami Rad
  • Conner Galloway
  • Daniel Treiman
  • Joel Xue
  • Qiao Li
  • Reza Sameni
  • Dave Albert
  • Gari D Clifford

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with stroke, blood clots, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and/or death. Multiple methods have been proposed for AFib detection, with varying performances, but no single approach appears to be optimal. We hypothesized that each state-of-the-art algorithm is appropriate for different subsets of patients and provides some independent information. Therefore, a set of suitably chosen algorithms, combined in a weighted voting framework, will provide a superior performance to any single algorithm. Methods: We investigate and modify 38 state-of-the-art AFib classification algorithms for a single-lead ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring device. All algorithms are ranked using a random forest classifier and an expert-labeled training dataset of 2,532 recordings. The seven top-ranked algorithms are combined by using an optimized weighting approach. Results: The proposed fusion algorithm, when validated on a separate test dataset consisting of 4,644 recordings, resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.99. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive-value (PPV), negative-predictive-value (NPV), and F1-score of the proposed algorithm were 0.93, 0.97, 0.87, 0.99, and 0.90, respectively, which were all superior to any single algorithm or any previously published. Conclusion: This study demonstrates how a set of well-chosen independent algorithms and a voting mechanism to fuse the outputs of the algorithms, outperforms any single state-of-the-art algorithm for AFib detection. The proposed framework is a case study for the general notion of crowdsourcing between open-source algorithms in healthcare applications. The extension of this framework to similar applications may significantly save time, effort, and resources, by combining readily existing algorithms. It is also a step toward the democratization of artificial intelligence and its application in healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Bahrami Rad & Conner Galloway & Daniel Treiman & Joel Xue & Qiao Li & Reza Sameni & Dave Albert & Gari D Clifford, 2021. "Atrial fibrillation detection in outpatient electrocardiogram monitoring: An algorithmic crowdsourcing approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259916
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259916&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0259916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mintu P Turakhia & Jason Shafrin & Katalin Bognar & Jeffrey Trocio & Younos Abdulsattar & Daniel Wiederkehr & Dana P Goldman, 2018. "Estimated prevalence of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.