IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0259299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Batch-produced, GIS-informed range maps for birds based on provenanced, crowd-sourced data inform conservation assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan M Huang
  • Wilderson Medina
  • Thomas M Brooks
  • Stuart H M Butchart
  • John W Fitzpatrick
  • Claudia Hermes
  • Clinton N Jenkins
  • Alison Johnston
  • Daniel J Lebbin
  • Binbin V Li
  • Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela
  • Mike Parr
  • Hannah Wheatley
  • David A Wiedenfeld
  • Christopher Wood
  • Stuart L Pimm

Abstract

Accurate maps of species ranges are essential to inform conservation, but time-consuming to produce and update. Given the pace of change of knowledge about species distributions and shifts in ranges under climate change and land use, a need exists for timely mapping approaches that enable batch processing employing widely available data. We develop a systematic approach of batch-processing range maps and derived Area of Habitat maps for terrestrial bird species with published ranges below 125,000 km2 in Central and South America. (Area of Habitat is the habitat available to a species within its range.) We combine existing range maps with the rapidly expanding crowd-sourced eBird data of presences and absences from frequently surveyed locations, plus readily accessible, high resolution satellite data on forest cover and elevation to map the Area of Habitat available to each species. Users can interrogate the maps produced to see details of the observations that contributed to the ranges. Previous estimates of Areas of Habitat were constrained within the published ranges and thus were, by definition, smaller—typically about 30%. This reflects how little habitat within suitable elevation ranges exists within the published ranges. Our results show that on average, Areas of Habitat are 12% larger than published ranges, reflecting the often-considerable extent that eBird records expand the known distributions of species. Interestingly, there are substantial differences between threatened and non-threatened species. Some 40% of Critically Endangered, 43% of Endangered, and 55% of Vulnerable species have Areas of Habitat larger than their published ranges, compared with 31% for Near Threatened and Least Concern species. The important finding for conservation is that threatened species are generally more widespread than previously estimated.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan M Huang & Wilderson Medina & Thomas M Brooks & Stuart H M Butchart & John W Fitzpatrick & Claudia Hermes & Clinton N Jenkins & Alison Johnston & Daniel J Lebbin & Binbin V Li & Natalia Ocampo-Peñ, 2021. "Batch-produced, GIS-informed range maps for birds based on provenanced, crowd-sourced data inform conservation assessments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259299
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259299
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259299&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0259299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa L. Manne & Thomas M. Brooks & Stuart L. Pimm, 1999. "Relative risk of extinction of passerine birds on continents and islands," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6733), pages 258-261, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.