IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0258050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ACCU3RATE: A mobile health application rating scale based on user reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Milon Biswas
  • Marzia Hoque Tania
  • M Shamim Kaiser
  • Russell Kabir
  • Mufti Mahmud
  • Atika Ahmad Kemal

Abstract

Background: Over the last decade, mobile health applications (mHealth App) have evolved exponentially to assess and support our health and well-being. Objective: This paper presents an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled mHealth app rating tool, called ACCU3RATE, which takes multidimensional measures such as user star rating, user review and features declared by the developer to generate the rating of an app. However, currently, there is very little conceptual understanding on how user reviews affect app rating from a multi-dimensional perspective. This study applies AI-based text mining technique to develop more comprehensive understanding of user feedback based on several important factors, determining the mHealth app ratings. Method: Based on the literature, six variables were identified that influence the mHealth app rating scale. These factors are user star rating, user text review, user interface (UI) design, functionality, security and privacy, and clinical approval. Natural Language Toolkit package is used for interpreting text and to identify the App users’ sentiment. Additional considerations were accessibility, protection and privacy, UI design for people living with physical disability. Moreover, the details of clinical approval, if exists, were taken from the developer’s statement. Finally, we fused all the inputs using fuzzy logic to calculate the new app rating score. Results and conclusions: ACCU3RATE concentrates on heart related Apps found in the play store and App gallery. The findings indicate the efficacy of the proposed method as opposed to the current device scale. This study has implications for both App developers and consumers who are using mHealth Apps to monitor and track their health. The performance evaluation shows that the proposed mHealth scale has shown excellent reliability as well as internal consistency of the scale, and high inter-rater reliability index. It has also been noticed that the fuzzy based rating scale, as in ACCU3RATE, matches more closely to the rating performed by experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Milon Biswas & Marzia Hoque Tania & M Shamim Kaiser & Russell Kabir & Mufti Mahmud & Atika Ahmad Kemal, 2021. "ACCU3RATE: A mobile health application rating scale based on user reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258050
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258050
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0258050&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0258050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pal, Shounak & Biswas, Baidyanath & Gupta, Rohit & Kumar, Ajay & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Exploring the factors that affect user experience in mobile-health applications: A text-mining and machine-learning approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0258050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.