IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0256832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The competitiveness analysis of shallot in Indonesia: A Policy Analysis Matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Saptana
  • Endro Gunawan
  • Atika Dyah Perwita
  • Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya
  • Valeriana Darwis
  • Ening Ariningsih
  • Ashari

Abstract

Shallot is a national strategic commodity in Indonesia, but it is development has a fundamental technical, socioeconomic, and policy support problems. Therefore, it is essential to know the competitiveness of shallot in Indonesia and the incentive policy to implement the comparative advantage to become a sustainable competitive advantage. The purposes of this study are to (1) analyze the profitability of shallot farming privately and socially, (2) analyze the competitiveness of shallot farming from a competitive and comparative advantage perspective, (3) review the impact of government policy on shallot farming, and (4) formulate incentive policies in the development of shallot commodities. The empirical results of the Policy Analysis Matrix revealed that shallot farming in production centers in Indonesia has both competitive and comparative advantages. The highest competitive and comparative advantages were found in the dry season in the upland of Malang district with the coefficient values of PCR (Private Cost Ratio) of 0.268–0.508 and DRCR (Domestic Resource Cost Ratio) of 0.208–0.323. The lowest competitive advantage was found in the lowland of East Lombok district in the dry season with a coefficient value of PCR 0.728–0.844. The lowest comparative advantage in the dry season was found in East Lombok district with a DRCR of 0.448, while in the rainy season, it was found in Wonosobo district with a DRCR of 0.522. These results mean that it is more profitable for Indonesia to increase domestic shallot production than to import. Improving shallot competitiveness can be carried out by implementing advanced technology, agricultural infrastructure, capacity building of farmers’ resources, and government incentive policies to increase productivity and competitiveness sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Saptana & Endro Gunawan & Atika Dyah Perwita & Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya & Valeriana Darwis & Ening Ariningsih & Ashari, 2021. "The competitiveness analysis of shallot in Indonesia: A Policy Analysis Matrix," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0256832
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0256832
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0256832&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0256832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank Group & IDE-JETRO & OECD & UIBE & World Trade Organization, 2017. "Global Value Chain Development Report 2017," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 29593.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andi Amran Asriadi & Muslim Salam & Rahmawaty Andi Nadja & Letty Fudjaja & Didi Rukmana & Muhammad Hatta Jamil & Muhammad Arsyad & Rahmadanih & Rafiqah Maulidiyah, 2024. "Determinants of Farmer Participation and Development of Shallot Farming in Search of Effective Farm Management Practices: Evidence Grounded in Structural Equation Modeling Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-30, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlo Piccardi & Lucia Tajoli & Riccardo Vitali, 2024. "Patterns of variability in the structure of global value chains: a network analysis," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(3), pages 1009-1036, August.
    2. Saptana & Apri Laila Sayekti & Atika Dyah Perwita & Bambang Sayaka & Endro Gunawan & Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya & Nur Qomariah Hayati & Yusuf & Sumaryanto & Muhammad Prama Yufdy & Sudi Mardianto & Atika Di, 2022. "Analysis of competitive and comparative advantages of potato production in Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Kouchachvili, Lia & Entchev, Evgueniy, 2018. "Power to gas and H2/NG blend in SMART energy networks concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-464.
    4. Kirchherr, Julian & Ahrenshop, Mats-Philip & Charles, Katrina, 2019. "Resettlement lies: Suggestive evidence from 29 large dam projects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 208-219.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0256832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.