IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0253896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is stem cell transplantation still needed for adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Ponvilawan
  • Smith Kungwankiattichai
  • Nipith Charoenngam
  • Weerapat Owattanapanich

Abstract

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the current mainstay treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) also play a significant role in the treatment of these patients. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of allogeneic (allo-) HSCT, autologous (auto-) HSCT, and chemotherapy (CMT) alone–all in combination with TKIs in adult Ph+ ALL patients. Materials and methods: This systematic review identified studies from the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from inception to April 2021 using search terms related to “ALL” and “HSCT.” Eligible studies could be randomized controlled trials or cohort studies that included adult Ph+ ALL patients who received a TKI and either allo-HSCT, auto-HSCT, or CMT alone, and that reported the number of patients in each group for each of our primary outcomes of interest: overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). Point estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) from each study were combined using the Hantel-Maenszel method. Results: After two rounds of review, 26 cohort studies were determined to be eligible for the meta-analysis. Adult Ph+ ALL patients who received HSCT had better survival outcomes than those who did not receive any HSCT (pooled odds ratio [OR] for OS of 1.61, 95%CI: 1.08–2.40; I2 = 59%, and for DFS of 3.23, 95%CI: 2.00–5.23; I2 = 62% for allo-HSCT; and, pooled OR for OS of 7.04, 95%CI: 1.97–25.15; I2 = 0%, and for DFS of 5.78, 95%CI: 1.04–32.19; I2 = 42% for auto-HSCT). Allo-HSCT recipients had comparable OS and DFS, but lower relapse rate compared to auto-HSCT recipients. Funnel plot generally demonstrated no presence of publication bias. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated superior results of HSCT in Ph+ ALL patients compared to CMT alone. Moreover, auto-HSCT could be implemented with comparable survival outcomes to allo-HSCT in patients with no available donor or when haploidentical HSCT is not feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Ponvilawan & Smith Kungwankiattichai & Nipith Charoenngam & Weerapat Owattanapanich, 2021. "Is stem cell transplantation still needed for adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy?: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253896
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253896
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253896&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0253896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.