IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0252112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-reported outcomes after primary or revision total hip arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched Asian cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Satoru Harada
  • Satoshi Hamai
  • Kyohei Shiomoto
  • Daisuke Hara
  • Masanori Fujii
  • Satoshi Ikemura
  • Goro Motomura
  • Yasuharu Nakashima

Abstract

Background: Few studies have compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated and compared PROMs between propensity score-matched primary and revision THA in an Asian cohort. Methods: The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, satisfaction score, and Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) were compared between 110 primary and 110 revision THAs after propensity score matching. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine which factors, including patients’ demographics, indication for revision, and pre-operative PROMs, were associated with post-operative PROMs in the revision THA cohort. Results: The revision THA cohort demonstrated significantly lower post-operative OHS, UCLA activity score, and satisfaction score (10% decrease on average) than those in the primary THA cohort (P

Suggested Citation

  • Satoru Harada & Satoshi Hamai & Kyohei Shiomoto & Daisuke Hara & Masanori Fujii & Satoshi Ikemura & Goro Motomura & Yasuharu Nakashima, 2021. "Patient-reported outcomes after primary or revision total hip arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched Asian cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0252112
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252112
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252112&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0252112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0252112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.