IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0250901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“I’m not gonna be able to do anything about it, then what’s the point?”: A broad group of stakeholders identify barriers and facilitators to HCV testing in a Massachusetts jail

Author

Listed:
  • Alysse G Wurcel
  • Jessica Reyes
  • Julia Zubiago
  • Peter J Koutoujian
  • Deirdre Burke
  • Tamsin A Knox
  • Thomas Concannon
  • Stephenie C Lemon
  • John B Wong
  • Karen M Freund
  • Curt G Beckwith
  • Amy M LeClair

Abstract

Background: Despite national guidelines promoting hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing in prisons, there is substantial heterogeneity on the implementation of HCV testing in jails. We sought to better understand barriers and opportunities for HCV testing by interviewing a broad group of stakeholders involved in HCV testing and treatment policies and procedures in Massachusetts jails. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with people incarcerated in Middlesex County Jail (North Billerica, MA), clinicians working in jail and community settings, corrections administrators, and representatives from public health, government, and industry between November 2018—April 2019. Results: 51/120 (42%) of people agreed to be interviewed including 21 incarcerated men (mean age 32 [IQR 25, 39], 60% non-White). Themes that emerged from these interviews included gaps in knowledge about HCV testing and treatment opportunities in jail, the impact of captivity and transience, and interest in improving linkage to HCV care after release. Many stakeholders discussed stigma around HCV infection as a factor in reluctance to provide HCV testing or treatment in the jail setting. Some stakeholders expressed that stigma often led decisionmakers to estimate a lower “worth” of incarcerated individuals living with HCV and therefore to decide against paying for HCV testing.”. Conclusion: All stakeholders agreed that HCV in the jail setting is a public health issue that needs to be addressed. Exploring stakeholders’ many ideas about how HCV testing and treatment can be approached is the first step in developing feasible and acceptable strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alysse G Wurcel & Jessica Reyes & Julia Zubiago & Peter J Koutoujian & Deirdre Burke & Tamsin A Knox & Thomas Concannon & Stephenie C Lemon & John B Wong & Karen M Freund & Curt G Beckwith & Amy M LeC, 2021. "“I’m not gonna be able to do anything about it, then what’s the point?”: A broad group of stakeholders identify barriers and facilitators to HCV testing in a Massachusetts jail," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0250901
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0250901
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0250901&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0250901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckwith, C.G. & Kurth, A.E. & Bazerman, L. & Solomon, L. & Patry, E. & Rich, J.D. & Kuo, I., 2015. "Survey of US correctional institutions for routine HCV testing," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(1), pages 68-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0250901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.