Author
Listed:
- Charlie B Fischer
- Nedghie Adrien
- Jeremiah J Silguero
- Julianne J Hopper
- Abir I Chowdhury
- Martha M Werler
Abstract
Mask wearing has been advocated by public health officials as a way to reduce the spread of COVID-19. In the United States, policies on mask wearing have varied from state to state over the course of the pandemic. Even as more and more states encourage or even mandate mask wearing, many citizens still resist the notion. Our research examines mask wearing policy and adherence in association with COVID-19 case rates. We used state-level data on mask wearing policy for the general public and on proportion of residents who stated they always wear masks in public. For all 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), these data were abstracted by month for April ─ September 2020 to measure their impact on COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month (May ─ October 2020). Monthly COVID-19 case rates (number of cases per capita over two weeks) >200 per 100,000 residents were considered high. Fourteen of the 15 states with no mask wearing policy for the general public through September reported a high COVID-19 rate. Of the 8 states with at least 75% mask adherence, none reported a high COVID-19 rate. States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors. Mean COVID-19 rates for states with at least 75% mask adherence in the preceding month was 109.26 per 100,000 compared to 249.99 per 100,000 for those with less adherence. Our analysis suggests high adherence to mask wearing could be a key factor in reducing the spread of COVID-19. This association between high mask adherence and reduced COVID-19 rates should influence policy makers and public health officials to focus on ways to improve mask adherence across the population in order to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.
Suggested Citation
Charlie B Fischer & Nedghie Adrien & Jeremiah J Silguero & Julianne J Hopper & Abir I Chowdhury & Martha M Werler, 2021.
"Mask adherence and rate of COVID-19 across the United States,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-10, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0249891
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249891
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- James Broughel & Michael Kotrous, 2021.
"The benefits of coronavirus suppression: A cost-benefit analysis of the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in the United States,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, June.
- Faina Linkov & Christopher L. Cummings & David J. Dausey, 2024.
"Official risk communication for COVID-19 and beyond: can we do a better job?,"
Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 293-300, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.