IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0249285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning methods to predict mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Limin Yu
  • Alexandra Halalau
  • Bhavinkumar Dalal
  • Amr E Abbas
  • Felicia Ivascu
  • Mitual Amin
  • Girish B Nair

Abstract

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected millions of people across the globe. It is associated with a high mortality rate and has created a global crisis by straining medical resources worldwide. Objectives: To develop and validate machine-learning models for prediction of mechanical ventilation (MV) for patients presenting to emergency room and for prediction of in-hospital mortality once a patient is admitted. Methods: Two cohorts were used for the two different aims. 1980 COVID-19 patients were enrolled for the aim of prediction ofMV. 1036 patients’ data, including demographics, past smoking and drinking history, past medical history and vital signs at emergency room (ER), laboratory values, and treatments were collected for training and 674 patients were enrolled for validation using XGBoost algorithm. For the second aim to predict in-hospital mortality, 3491 hospitalized patients via ER were enrolled. CatBoost, a new gradient-boosting algorithm was applied for training and validation of the cohort. Results: Older age, higher temperature, increased respiratory rate (RR) and a lower oxygen saturation (SpO2) from the first set of vital signs were associated with an increased risk of MV amongst the 1980 patients in the ER. The model had a high accuracy of 86.2% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.8%. While, patients who required MV, had a higher RR, Body mass index (BMI) and longer length of stay in the hospital were the major features associated with in-hospital mortality. The second model had a high accuracy of 80% with NPV of 81.6%. Conclusion: Machine learning models using XGBoost and catBoost algorithms can predict need for mechanical ventilation and mortality with a very high accuracy in COVID-19 patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Limin Yu & Alexandra Halalau & Bhavinkumar Dalal & Amr E Abbas & Felicia Ivascu & Mitual Amin & Girish B Nair, 2021. "Machine learning methods to predict mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249285
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249285&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0249285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Wang & Gang Wan & Yi Shen & Zhenghua Zhao & Ling Lin & Wei Zhang & Rui Song & Di Tian & Jing Wen & Yongxiang Zhao & Xiaoli Yu & Li Liu & Yang Feng & Yuanni Liu & Chunqian Qiang & Jianping Duan & Y, 2019. "A nomogram to predict mortality in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome at the early stage—A multicenter study in China," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.