IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0248649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Descriptive analysis of sickle cell patients living in France: The PHEDRE cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Gerardin
  • Morgane Rousselet
  • Marie-Laure Couec
  • Agathe Masseau
  • Marylène Guerlais
  • Nicolas Authier
  • Sylvie Deheul
  • Anne Roussin
  • Joelle Micallef
  • Samira Djezzar
  • French Addictovigilance Network (FAN)
  • Fanny Feuillet
  • Pascale Jolliet
  • Caroline Victorri-Vigneau

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) induces chronic haemolytic anaemia and intermittent vaso-occlusion that results in tissue ischaemia causing acute, severe pain episodes that can lead to frequent hospitalizations. These consequences can have repercussions on family, social, school and/or professional life. Here, we present some of the results of the PHEDRE study (Pharmacodépendance Et DREpanocytose—drug dependence and sickle-cell disease), which is the largest study of patients with SCD in France. This paper intends to describe characteristics of the French SCD population. We also aimed to assess the impact of the disease on the lives of patients using objective and subjective variables. Methods: The PHEDRE study was a national multicentric observational study. Adults, adolescents and children with a confirmed SCD diagnosis were included in the study by their referring doctor. Then, they were interviewed by phone about their socioeconomic status, about the impact of the disease on their lives and about their analgesic and psychoactive drug use. Results: The study population consisted of 872 patients (28% were minors). Seventy-two percent of adults were active, and all minors were in school. Many patients presented criteria of severe SCD. Seventy-five percent were homozygous SS, 15% were double heterozygotes SC and 8% were heterozygotes Sβthal, 87% received specific treatment, 58% were hospitalized at least once for vaso-occlusive crisis in the past 12 months, and the number of analgesic drugs taken averaged 3.8. Seventy-five percent of patients reported academic or professional consequences related to their SCD, and 52% reported social consequences. Conclusions: The impact of SCD on patients’ lives can be significant, nevertheless their social integration seems to be maintained. We highlighted respect of recommendations regarding analgesic treatments and only a few patients used tobacco, alcohol or cannabis. Trial registration: Clinical Trials, NCT02580565; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ Registered 16 October 2015.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Gerardin & Morgane Rousselet & Marie-Laure Couec & Agathe Masseau & Marylène Guerlais & Nicolas Authier & Sylvie Deheul & Anne Roussin & Joelle Micallef & Samira Djezzar & French Addictovigilanc, 2021. "Descriptive analysis of sickle cell patients living in France: The PHEDRE cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248649
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248649
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248649&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0248649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.