IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0248003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive factors affecting percutaneous drainage duration in the percutaneous treatment of common bile duct stones

Author

Listed:
  • Min Uk Kim
  • Yoontaek Lee
  • Jae Hwan Lee
  • Soo Buem Cho
  • Myoung Seok Lee
  • Young Ho So
  • Young Ho Choi

Abstract

The duration of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a critical factor that determines the duration of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting the PTBD duration in patients who underwent percutaneous treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study analyzed data of 169 patients who underwent percutaneous treatment of CBD stones from June 2009 to June 2019. Demographic data, characteristics of stone, procedure-related factors, and laboratory findings before the insertion of PTBD tubes were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the effect of confounding factors on the PTBD duration, multivariate linear regression analysis was applied, incorporating significant predictive factors identified in the univariate regression analysis. In the univariate regression analysis, the predictive factor that showed high correlation with the PTBD duration was the initial total bilirubin level (coefficient = 0.68, P

Suggested Citation

  • Min Uk Kim & Yoontaek Lee & Jae Hwan Lee & Soo Buem Cho & Myoung Seok Lee & Young Ho So & Young Ho Choi, 2021. "Predictive factors affecting percutaneous drainage duration in the percutaneous treatment of common bile duct stones," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248003
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248003&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0248003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.