IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0247715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing civility at an academic health science center: Implications for employee satisfaction and well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa A Campbell
  • Jenna R LaFreniere
  • Mhd Hasan Almekdash
  • David D Perlmutter
  • Huaxin Song
  • Patricia J Kelly
  • Rohali Keesari
  • Kay Leigh Shannon

Abstract

Incivilities are pervasive among workers in healthcare institutions. Previously identified effects include deterioration of employee physical and mental health, absenteeism, burnout, and turnover, as well as reduced patient safety and quality of care. This study documented factors related to organizational civility at an academic health sciences center (AHSC) as the basis for future intervention work. We used a cross-sectional research design to conduct an online survey at four of five campuses of an AHSC. Using the Organizational Civility Scale (OCS), we assessed differences across gender, race (White and non-White) and job type (faculty or staff) in the eleven subscales (frequency of incivility, perceptions of organizational climate, existence of civility resources, importance of civility resources, feelings about current employment, employee satisfaction, sources of stress, coping strategies, overall levels of stress/coping ability, and overall civility rating). Significant gender differences were found in six of the eleven subscales: perception of organizational climate (p

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa A Campbell & Jenna R LaFreniere & Mhd Hasan Almekdash & David D Perlmutter & Huaxin Song & Patricia J Kelly & Rohali Keesari & Kay Leigh Shannon, 2021. "Assessing civility at an academic health science center: Implications for employee satisfaction and well-being," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247715
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247715
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247715&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0247715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.