IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0247579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student reactions to traumatic material in literature: Implications for trigger warnings

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Kimble
  • William Flack
  • Jennifer Koide
  • Kelly Bennion
  • Miranda Brenneman
  • Cynthia Meyersburg

Abstract

Introduction: While trigger warnings have garnered significant debate, few studies have investigated how students typically respond to potentially triggering material. Method: In this study, three hundred and fifty-five undergraduate students from four universities read a passage describing incidences of both physical and sexual assault. Longitudinal measures of subjective distress, PTSD symptoms, and emotional reactivity were taken. Results: Greater than 96% of participants read the triggering passage even when given a non-triggering alternative to read. Of those who read the triggering passage, those with triggering traumas did not report more distress although those with higher PTSD scores did. Two weeks later, those with trigger traumas and/or PTSD did not report an increase in trauma symptoms as a result of reading the triggering passage. Conclusions: Students with relevant traumas do not avoid triggering material and the effects appear to be brief. Students with PTSD do not report an exacerbation of symptoms two weeks later as a function of reading the passage.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Kimble & William Flack & Jennifer Koide & Kelly Bennion & Miranda Brenneman & Cynthia Meyersburg, 2021. "Student reactions to traumatic material in literature: Implications for trigger warnings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247579
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247579
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247579&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0247579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.