IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0246728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource allocation for depression management in general practice: A simple data-based filter model

Author

Listed:
  • Breanne Hobden
  • Mariko Carey
  • Rob Sanson-Fisher
  • Andrew Searles
  • Christopher Oldmeadow
  • Allison Boyes

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to illustrate the potential utility of a simple filter model in understanding the patient outcome and cost-effectiveness implications for depression interventions in primary care. Methods: Modelling of hypothetical intervention scenarios during different stages of the treatment pathway was conducted. Results: Three scenarios were developed for depression related to increasing detection, treatment response and treatment uptake. The incremental costs, incremental number of successes (i.e., depression remission) and the incremental costs-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. In the modelled scenarios, increasing provider treatment response resulted in the greatest number of incremental successes above baseline, however, it was also associated with the greatest ICER. Increasing detection rates was associated with the second greatest increase to incremental successes above baseline and had the lowest ICER. Conclusions: The authors recommend utility of the filter model to guide the identification of areas where policy stakeholders and/or researchers should invest their efforts in depression management.

Suggested Citation

  • Breanne Hobden & Mariko Carey & Rob Sanson-Fisher & Andrew Searles & Christopher Oldmeadow & Allison Boyes, 2021. "Resource allocation for depression management in general practice: A simple data-based filter model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246728
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246728&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0246728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.