IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0246528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuous home monitoring of Parkinson’s disease using inertial sensors: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Sica
  • Salvatore Tedesco
  • Colum Crowe
  • Lorna Kenny
  • Kevin Moore
  • Suzanne Timmons
  • John Barton
  • Brendan O’Flynn
  • Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder of the central nervous system that deteriorates motor functions, while it is also accompanied by a large diversity of non-motor symptoms such as cognitive impairment and mood changes, hallucinations, and sleep disturbance. Parkinsonism is evaluated during clinical examinations and appropriate medical treatments are directed towards alleviating symptoms. Tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers could be adopted to support clinicians in the decision-making process by objectively quantifying the patient’s condition. In this context, at-home data collections aim to capture motor function during daily living and unobstructedly assess the patients’ status and the disease’s symptoms for prolonged time periods. This review aims to collate existing literature on PD monitoring using inertial sensors while it focuses on papers with at least one free-living data capture unsupervised either directly or via videotapes. Twenty-four papers were selected at the end of the process: fourteen investigated gait impairments, eight of which focused on walking, three on turning, two on falls, and one on physical activity; ten articles on the other hand examined symptoms, including bradykinesia, tremor, dyskinesia, and motor state fluctuations in the on/off phenomenon. In summary, inertial sensors are capable of gathering data over a long period of time and have the potential to facilitate the monitoring of people with Parkinson’s, providing relevant information about their motor status. Concerning gait impairments, kinematic parameters (such as duration of gait cycle, step length, and velocity) were typically used to discern PD from healthy subjects, whereas for symptoms’ assessment, researchers were capable of achieving accuracies of over 90% in a free-living environment. Further investigations should be focused on the development of ad-hoc hardware and software capable of providing real-time feedback to clinicians and patients. In addition, features such as the wearability of the system and user comfort, set-up process, and instructions for use, need to be strongly considered in the development of wearable sensors for PD monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Sica & Salvatore Tedesco & Colum Crowe & Lorna Kenny & Kevin Moore & Suzanne Timmons & John Barton & Brendan O’Flynn & Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris, 2021. "Continuous home monitoring of Parkinson’s disease using inertial sensors: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246528
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246528
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246528&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0246528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aner Weiss & Talia Herman & Nir Giladi & Jeffrey M Hausdorff, 2014. "Objective Assessment of Fall Risk in Parkinson's Disease Using a Body-Fixed Sensor Worn for 3 Days," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Christiana Ossig & Florin Gandor & Mareike Fauser & Cecile Bosredon & Leonid Churilov & Heinz Reichmann & Malcolm K Horne & Georg Ebersbach & Alexander Storch, 2016. "Correlation of Quantitative Motor State Assessment Using a Kinetograph and Patient Diaries in Advanced PD: Data from an Observational Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.