IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0246448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal two-stage design of single arm Phase II clinical trials based on median event time test

Author

Listed:
  • Yeonhee Park

Abstract

The Phase II clinical trials aim to assess the therapeutic efficacy of a new drug. The therapeutic efficacy has been often quantified by response rate such as overall response rate or survival probability in the Phase II setting. However, there is a strong desire to use survival time, which is the gold standard endpoint for the confirmatory Phase III study, when investigators set the primary objective of the Phase II study and test hypotheses based on the median survivals. We propose a method for median event time test to provide the sample size calculation and decision rule of testing. The decision rule is simple and straightforward in that it compares the observed median event time to the identified threshold. Moreover, it is extended to optimal two-stage design for practice, which extends the idea of Simon’s optimal two-stage design for survival endpoint. We investigate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies. The proposed methods are applied to redesign a trial based on median event time for trial illustration, and practical strategies are given for application of proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeonhee Park, 2021. "Optimal two-stage design of single arm Phase II clinical trials based on median event time test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246448
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246448&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0246448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.