IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0246126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Deep Learning models for predicting ALK-5 inhibition

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Z Espinoza
  • Rafaela M Angelo
  • Patricia R Oliveira
  • Kathia M Honorio

Abstract

Computational methods have been widely used in drug design. The recent developments in machine learning techniques and the ever-growing chemical and biological databases are fertile ground for discoveries in this area. In this study, we evaluated the performance of Deep Learning models in comparison to Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression for predicting the biological activity (pIC50) of ALK-5 inhibitors as candidates to treat cancer. The generalization power of the models was assessed by internal and external validation procedures. A deep neural network model obtained the best performance in this comparative study, achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.658 on the external validation set with mean square error and mean absolute error of 0.373 and 0.450, respectively. Additionally, the relevance of the chemical descriptors for the prediction of biological activity was estimated using Permutation Importance. We can conclude that the forecast model obtained by the deep neural network is suitable for the problem and can be employed to predict the biological activity of new ALK-5 inhibitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Z Espinoza & Rafaela M Angelo & Patricia R Oliveira & Kathia M Honorio, 2021. "Evaluating Deep Learning models for predicting ALK-5 inhibition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246126
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246126&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0246126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.