Author
Listed:
- Sandra Mudhune
- Sydney Chauwa Phiri
- Marta R Prescott
- Elizabeth A McCarthy
- Aaron Banda
- Prudence Haimbe
- Francis Dien Mwansa
- Angel Mwiche
- Andrew Silumesii
- Kabamba Micheck
- Hilda Shakwelele
- Margaret L Prust
Abstract
Although strong evidence exists about the effectiveness of basic childbirth services in reducing maternal and newborn mortality, these services are not provided in every childbirth, even those at health facilities. The WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) was developed as a job aide to remind health workers of evidenced-based practices to be provided at specific points in the childbirth process. The Zambian government requested context-specific evidence on the feasibility and outcomes associated with introducing the checklist and related mentorship. A study was conducted on use of the SCC in four facilities in Nchelenge District of Zambia. Observations of childbirth services were conducted just before and six months after the introduction of the intervention. Observers used a structured tool to record adherence to essential services indicated on the checklist. The primary outcome of interest was the change in the average proportion of essential childbirth practices completed. Feedback questionnaires were administered to health workers before and six months after the intervention. At baseline and endline, 108 and 148 pause points were observed, respectively. There was an increase from 57% to 76% of tasks performed (p = 0.04). Considering only these cases where necessary supplies were available, health workers completed 60% of associated tasks at baseline compared to 84% at endline (p
Suggested Citation
Sandra Mudhune & Sydney Chauwa Phiri & Marta R Prescott & Elizabeth A McCarthy & Aaron Banda & Prudence Haimbe & Francis Dien Mwansa & Angel Mwiche & Andrew Silumesii & Kabamba Micheck & Hilda Shakwel, 2020.
"Improving the quality of childbirth services in Zambia through introduction of the Safe Childbirth Checklist and systems-focused mentorship,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0244310
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244310
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0244310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.