IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0243785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of late auditory evoked potentials as a candidate biomarker in the assessment of tinnitus

Author

Listed:
  • Emilie Cardon
  • Iris Joossen
  • Hanne Vermeersch
  • Laure Jacquemin
  • Griet Mertens
  • Olivier M Vanderveken
  • Vedat Topsakal
  • Paul Van de Heyning
  • Vincent Van Rompaey
  • Annick Gilles

Abstract

Subjective tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of any sound source, is routinely assessed using questionnaires. The subjective nature of these tools hampers objective evaluation of tinnitus presence, severity and treatment effects. Late auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) might be considered as a potential biomarker for assessing tinnitus complaints. Using a multivariate meta-analytic model including data from twenty-one studies, we determined the LAEP components differing systematically between tinnitus patients and controls. Results from this model indicate that amplitude of the P300 component is lower in tinnitus patients (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.83, p

Suggested Citation

  • Emilie Cardon & Iris Joossen & Hanne Vermeersch & Laure Jacquemin & Griet Mertens & Olivier M Vanderveken & Vedat Topsakal & Paul Van de Heyning & Vincent Van Rompaey & Annick Gilles, 2020. "Systematic review and meta-analysis of late auditory evoked potentials as a candidate biomarker in the assessment of tinnitus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0243785
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243785
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243785&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0243785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0243785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.