IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0243079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating high resolution drone imagery and forest inventory to distinguish canopy and understory trees and quantify their contributions to forest structure and dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Raquel Fernandes Araujo
  • Jeffrey Q Chambers
  • Carlos Henrique Souza Celes
  • Helene C Muller-Landau
  • Ana Paula Ferreira dos Santos
  • Fabiano Emmert
  • Gabriel H P M Ribeiro
  • Bruno Oliva Gimenez
  • Adriano J N Lima
  • Moacir A A Campos
  • Niro Higuchi

Abstract

Tree growth and survival differ strongly between canopy trees (those directly exposed to overhead light), and understory trees. However, the structural complexity of many tropical forests makes it difficult to determine canopy positions. The integration of remote sensing and ground-based data enables this determination and measurements of how canopy and understory trees differ in structure and dynamics. Here we analyzed 2 cm resolution RGB imagery collected by a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS), also known as drone, together with two decades of bi-annual tree censuses for 2 ha of old growth forest in the Central Amazon. We delineated all crowns visible in the imagery and linked each crown to a tagged stem through field work. Canopy trees constituted 40% of the 1244 inventoried trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) > 10 cm, and accounted for ~70% of aboveground carbon stocks and wood productivity. The probability of being in the canopy increased logistically with tree diameter, passing through 50% at 23.5 cm DBH. Diameter growth was on average twice as large in canopy trees as in understory trees. Growth rates were unrelated to diameter in canopy trees and positively related to diameter in understory trees, consistent with the idea that light availability increases with diameter in the understory but not the canopy. The whole stand size distribution was best fit by a Weibull distribution, whereas the separate size distributions of understory trees or canopy trees > 25 cm DBH were equally well fit by exponential and Weibull distributions, consistent with mechanistic forest models. The identification and field mapping of crowns seen in a high resolution orthomosaic revealed new patterns in the structure and dynamics of trees of canopy vs. understory at this site, demonstrating the value of traditional tree censuses with drone remote sensing.

Suggested Citation

  • Raquel Fernandes Araujo & Jeffrey Q Chambers & Carlos Henrique Souza Celes & Helene C Muller-Landau & Ana Paula Ferreira dos Santos & Fabiano Emmert & Gabriel H P M Ribeiro & Bruno Oliva Gimenez & Adr, 2020. "Integrating high resolution drone imagery and forest inventory to distinguish canopy and understory trees and quantify their contributions to forest structure and dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0243079
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243079&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0243079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian J. Enquist & Karl J. Niklas, 2001. "Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6829), pages 655-660, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongying Li & Zhongwen Huang & Junyi Gai & Song Wu & Yanru Zeng & Qin Li & Rongling Wu, 2007. "A Conceptual Framework for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Regulating Ontogenetic Allometry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Brolly, Matthew & Woodhouse, Iain H., 2012. "A “Matchstick Model” of microwave backscatter from a forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 237, pages 74-87.
    3. Clough, Brian J. & Russell, Matthew B. & Domke, Grant M. & Woodall, Christopher W. & Radtke, Philip J., 2016. "Comparing tree foliage biomass models fitted to a multispecies, felled-tree biomass dataset for the United States," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 333(C), pages 79-91.
    4. Picard, Nicolas, 2021. "The role of spatial competitive interactions between trees in shaping forest patterns," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 36-45.
    5. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2009. "Errors, robustness, and the fourth quadrant," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 744-759, October.
    6. Wiegand, Kerstin & Saltz, David & Ward, David & Levin, Simon A., 2008. "The role of size inequality in self-thinning: A pattern-oriented simulation model for arid savannas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 431-445.
    7. Amsalu Abich & Mesele Negash & Asmamaw Alemu & Temesgen Gashaw, 2022. "Aboveground Biomass Models in the Combretum-Terminalia Woodlands of Ethiopia: Testing Species and Site Variation Effects," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    8. James A Lutz & Andrew J Larson & Mark E Swanson & James A Freund, 2012. "Ecological Importance of Large-Diameter Trees in a Temperate Mixed-Conifer Forest," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Matthew H Bonds & Andrew P Dobson & Donald C Keenan, 2012. "Disease Ecology, Biodiversity, and the Latitudinal Gradient in Income," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Nilsen, Erlend B. & Finstad, Anders G. & Næsje, Tor F. & Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne, 2013. "Using mass scaling of movement cost and resource encounter rate to predict animal body size–Population density relationships," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 23-28.
    11. Ma, Ping & Han, Xiao-Hui & Lin, Yue & Moore, John & Guo, Yao-Xin & Yue, Ming, 2019. "Exploring the relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors that alter the self-thinning rule: Insights from individual-based modelling and machine-learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 16-24.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0243079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.