IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0242792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The meaning of home questionnaire revisited: Psychometric analyses among people with Parkinson’s disease reveals new dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Nilla Andersson
  • Maria H Nilsson
  • Björn Slaug
  • Frank Oswald
  • Susanne Iwarsson

Abstract

Background: Research addressing perceptions of housing in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) is rare, and existing instruments capturing perceived aspects of housing are rarely used. Perceived housing comprises of several domains and is associated with health in general older populations. One such domain is meaning of home, captured by the Meaning of Home Questionnaire (MOH). The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the MOH among people with PD. Materials and methods: The MOH was administrated to 245 participants with PD (mean age = 69.9 years; mean PD duration = 9.7 years). The instrument consisted of four sub-scales with 28 items, each with 11 response options (strongly disagree = 0; strongly agree = 10). We evaluated data quality, structural validity (factor analysis), construct validity (i.e., testing correlations with relevant constructs according to pre-defined hypotheses), corrected item total correlations, floor and ceiling effects and internal consistency. Results: The data quality was high (0–1.2% missing data). The exploratory factor analysis suggested removal of five items and revealed three new factors; “My home is my castle”, “My home is my prison” and “My home is my social hub”. The 23-item MOH showed statistically significant correlations with life satisfaction, usability and ADL dependence, while not correlated with number of environmental barriers. These findings were largely as hypothesised, thus supporting construct validity (both convergent and discriminant). The corrected item total correlations were >0.3 for all items and the internal consistency was >0.70 for all sub-scales. No floor or ceiling effects were reported except for the sub-scale “My home is my castle” (ceiling effect = 15.6%). Conclusions: The 23-item MOH version with three new sub-scales is sufficiently reliable and valid for use in PD populations. This paves the way for further research of meaning of home among people with PD, using the 23-item MOH version.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilla Andersson & Maria H Nilsson & Björn Slaug & Frank Oswald & Susanne Iwarsson, 2020. "The meaning of home questionnaire revisited: Psychometric analyses among people with Parkinson’s disease reveals new dimensions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0242792
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0242792
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0242792&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0242792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josue G. Amián & David Alarcón & Cristina Fernández-Portero & Jose A. Sánchez-Medina, 2021. "Aging Living at Home: Residential Satisfaction among Active Older Adults Based on the Perceived Home Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0242792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.