Author
Listed:
- Yoshimasa Horikoshi
- Chizuko Yaguchi
- Naomi Furuta-Isomura
- Toshiya Itoh
- Kenta Kawai
- Tomoaki Oda
- Masako Matsumoto
- Yukiko Kohmura-Kobayashi
- Naoaki Tamura
- Toshiyuki Uchida
- Naohiro Kanayama
- Hiroaki Itoh
Abstract
An opaque fetal membrane based on gross appearance is traditionally indicative of histological chorioamnionitis; however, to the best of our knowledge, there is currently no supportive evidence, and its diagnostic efficiency has not yet been scientifically demonstrated. The present study aimed to provide scientific insights into the traditional concept of an opaque fetal membrane based on gross appearance being an indicator of histological chorioamnionitis. We examined the placental pathology after screening of the placental gross appearance and perinatal complications and did not examine uncomplicated deliveries. We investigated the relationship between the presence of an opaque fetal membrane and histological chorioamnionitis (Cohort 1, 571 placentas) or the outcomes of neonates delivered at term (Cohort 2, 409 placentas) at Hamamatsu University School of Medicine between 2010 and 2017. The judgment of a positive opaque fetal membrane based on gross appearance correlated with histological chorioamnionitis (Cohort 1). Its sensitivity and specificity were 66.7 and 89.9%, respectively, while positive and negative predictive values were 86.8 and 73.0%, respectively. The judgment of a positive opaque fetal membrane based on gross appearance significantly correlated with chorioamnionitis-related complications in term newborns after adjustments for confounding factors (OR;1.82 [1.07–3.11], P
Suggested Citation
Yoshimasa Horikoshi & Chizuko Yaguchi & Naomi Furuta-Isomura & Toshiya Itoh & Kenta Kawai & Tomoaki Oda & Masako Matsumoto & Yukiko Kohmura-Kobayashi & Naoaki Tamura & Toshiyuki Uchida & Naohiro Kanay, 2020.
"Gross appearance of the fetal membrane on the placental surface is associated with histological chorioamnionitis and neonatal respiratory disorders,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-10, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0242579
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242579
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0242579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.